The Use of Learning Management System (LMS): Are we ‘using’ it right?

K. Sim
{"title":"The Use of Learning Management System (LMS): Are we ‘using’ it right?","authors":"K. Sim","doi":"10.37074/jalt.2021.4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the rapid progress of the use of technologies in academic practices, higher education institutions around the world are investing heavily in various learning management systems (LMS). LMS, such as Blackboard, is considered among the most commonly used in the process of teaching and learning. This pilot study aimed to identify the academics’ assumptions and expectations of Blackboard use that had influences on their practices at a New Zealand university. Data were gathered through class observation sessions with photograph and video capture as well as individual discussions for a trimester (13 weeks). Focus of the thematic analysis was on the viewpoints expressed by the academic participants on their Blackboard courses and in their discussions, as well as in their classes about their ideas, practices, and beliefs in relation to their Blackboard use. The major findings that emerged from the data were the diverse perspectives of the roles of Blackboard in the process of teaching and learning that led to the questionable use of Blackboard in terms of “efficiency” and “effectiveness”. It is evident that explicit support needs to be provided to academics in order for them to understand the affordances of Blackboard and thus to use Blackboard pedagogically in the process of teaching and learning. The study advocates for a shift of Blackboard use in relation to a new understanding of teaching and learning schemas in higher education.","PeriodicalId":334920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching","volume":"262 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2021.4.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Due to the rapid progress of the use of technologies in academic practices, higher education institutions around the world are investing heavily in various learning management systems (LMS). LMS, such as Blackboard, is considered among the most commonly used in the process of teaching and learning. This pilot study aimed to identify the academics’ assumptions and expectations of Blackboard use that had influences on their practices at a New Zealand university. Data were gathered through class observation sessions with photograph and video capture as well as individual discussions for a trimester (13 weeks). Focus of the thematic analysis was on the viewpoints expressed by the academic participants on their Blackboard courses and in their discussions, as well as in their classes about their ideas, practices, and beliefs in relation to their Blackboard use. The major findings that emerged from the data were the diverse perspectives of the roles of Blackboard in the process of teaching and learning that led to the questionable use of Blackboard in terms of “efficiency” and “effectiveness”. It is evident that explicit support needs to be provided to academics in order for them to understand the affordances of Blackboard and thus to use Blackboard pedagogically in the process of teaching and learning. The study advocates for a shift of Blackboard use in relation to a new understanding of teaching and learning schemas in higher education.
学习管理系统(LMS)的使用:我们是否正确使用它?
由于技术在学术实践中的应用进展迅速,世界各地的高等教育机构正在大力投资于各种学习管理系统(LMS)。LMS,如Blackboard,被认为是教学过程中最常用的工具之一。这项初步研究旨在确定新西兰一所大学的学者对Blackboard使用的假设和期望,这些假设和期望影响了他们的实践。数据的收集是通过三个月(13周)的课堂观察课程,包括照片和视频拍摄以及个人讨论。主题分析的重点是学术参与者在黑板课程和讨论中表达的观点,以及在课堂上关于他们使用黑板的想法、实践和信念。从这些数据中得出的主要发现是,人们对Blackboard在教学过程中所扮演角色的不同看法,导致人们对Blackboard在“效率”和“效果”方面的使用存在疑问。很明显,需要向学者提供明确的支持,以便他们了解Blackboard的功能,从而在教学和学习过程中使用Blackboard。该研究提倡在对高等教育教学模式和学习模式的新理解的基础上,改变黑板的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信