ICD-11 (psychiatric section): who diagnoses better treats better?

V. Mendelevich
{"title":"ICD-11 (psychiatric section): who diagnoses better treats better?","authors":"V. Mendelevich","doi":"10.17816/nb108994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the reasons for the opposition of a significant number of Russian psychiatrists to the introduction of a new international classification of mental and behavioral disorders (ICD-11). An opinion is expressed that the increase in the effectiveness of therapy from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in world psychiatry is associated not so much with the transition to syndromic (anosological) assessment of clinical phenomena, but because of the widespread use of modern psychopharmacological drugs and the introduction of evidence-based medicine principles, which in domestic psychiatry are also criticized. It is argued that two important aspects of psychiatry diagnosis and therapy are practically independent of each other, and the entire dispute about rejection or acceptance of the new classification (ICD-11) has nothing to do with the effectiveness of therapy.","PeriodicalId":436189,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Bulletin","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/nb108994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the reasons for the opposition of a significant number of Russian psychiatrists to the introduction of a new international classification of mental and behavioral disorders (ICD-11). An opinion is expressed that the increase in the effectiveness of therapy from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in world psychiatry is associated not so much with the transition to syndromic (anosological) assessment of clinical phenomena, but because of the widespread use of modern psychopharmacological drugs and the introduction of evidence-based medicine principles, which in domestic psychiatry are also criticized. It is argued that two important aspects of psychiatry diagnosis and therapy are practically independent of each other, and the entire dispute about rejection or acceptance of the new classification (ICD-11) has nothing to do with the effectiveness of therapy.
ICD-11(精神科):谁诊断得好治疗得好?
本文分析了大量俄罗斯精神病学家反对引入新的国际精神和行为障碍分类(ICD-11)的原因。有一种观点认为,世界精神病学从ICD-9到ICD-10治疗效果的提高与临床现象向综合征(精神病学)评估的过渡没有太大关系,而是因为现代精神药理学药物的广泛使用和循证医学原则的引入,这在国内精神病学中也受到批评。有人认为,精神病学诊断和治疗的两个重要方面实际上是相互独立的,关于拒绝或接受新分类(ICD-11)的整个争议与治疗的有效性无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信