Will there still be a need for preparation in Gynecology and Obstetrics for the general surgeons and vice-versa?

{"title":"Will there still be a need for preparation in Gynecology and Obstetrics for the general surgeons and vice-versa?","authors":"","doi":"10.36811/ojgor.2020.110017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of the various surgical specialties and their respective training programs, together with some shortening in the duration of the residencies, has led to their separation from what we might call the mother speciality, General Surgery. In some cases, like Gynecology and Obstetrics, at least in my country, this has become total, with reflexes in the hospital clinical practice.\n\nSimilarly, the training in General Surgery has been emptied from surgical exposure to other organs, systems and anatomical areas, with an increasing focus on digestive tract pathology and emphasis on laparoscopic approaches, which may make the general surgeon himself feel less prepared for acute gynecological or obstetric pathology.\n\nAlthough, in elective surgical practice, there tends to be an approach between the General Surgery and Gynecology teams, with the establishment of close collaborations, especially in the treatment of peritoneal dissemination of ovarian neoplasias, it is in the context of urgency that there is more to be done.\n\nIn my case, during a clinical practice of more than 30 years as a general and emergency surgeon, it was not unusual to be called to operating rooms, sometimes peripheral, in the context of cesarean sections, to help solve complex situations, almost always of hemorrhagic nature. Among these, the lesions of the uterine arteries, during the incision of the uterus, and those of the inferior epigastric vessels, artery and veins, because of the retractors, especially in transversal incisions of the abdominal wall, these with the particularity of not being easily identifiable, because they produce essentially retroperitoneal bleeding, with a somewhat late clinical expression. Due, mainly, to the associated coagulopathy, it was necessary, many times, a strategy of damage control [2], with initial abbreviated surgical intervention.\n\nThey are - without forgetting many others, like those of the digestive tract or ureters - situations of enormous gravity and in young women that should lead to a greater reflection from both sides; either on the part of obstetricians, in terms of reintroducing General Surgery training in their respective formative programs, or, vice versa, on the part of general surgeons linked to the emergency, not always familiar with them.\n\n[2] This strategy consists of an initial abbreviated surgical intervention, with the sole purpose of resolving hemorrhage and contamination; having started in abdominal trauma, it quickly spread out of the abdomen and the context of traumatic pathology.","PeriodicalId":321045,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36811/ojgor.2020.110017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of the various surgical specialties and their respective training programs, together with some shortening in the duration of the residencies, has led to their separation from what we might call the mother speciality, General Surgery. In some cases, like Gynecology and Obstetrics, at least in my country, this has become total, with reflexes in the hospital clinical practice. Similarly, the training in General Surgery has been emptied from surgical exposure to other organs, systems and anatomical areas, with an increasing focus on digestive tract pathology and emphasis on laparoscopic approaches, which may make the general surgeon himself feel less prepared for acute gynecological or obstetric pathology. Although, in elective surgical practice, there tends to be an approach between the General Surgery and Gynecology teams, with the establishment of close collaborations, especially in the treatment of peritoneal dissemination of ovarian neoplasias, it is in the context of urgency that there is more to be done. In my case, during a clinical practice of more than 30 years as a general and emergency surgeon, it was not unusual to be called to operating rooms, sometimes peripheral, in the context of cesarean sections, to help solve complex situations, almost always of hemorrhagic nature. Among these, the lesions of the uterine arteries, during the incision of the uterus, and those of the inferior epigastric vessels, artery and veins, because of the retractors, especially in transversal incisions of the abdominal wall, these with the particularity of not being easily identifiable, because they produce essentially retroperitoneal bleeding, with a somewhat late clinical expression. Due, mainly, to the associated coagulopathy, it was necessary, many times, a strategy of damage control [2], with initial abbreviated surgical intervention. They are - without forgetting many others, like those of the digestive tract or ureters - situations of enormous gravity and in young women that should lead to a greater reflection from both sides; either on the part of obstetricians, in terms of reintroducing General Surgery training in their respective formative programs, or, vice versa, on the part of general surgeons linked to the emergency, not always familiar with them. [2] This strategy consists of an initial abbreviated surgical intervention, with the sole purpose of resolving hemorrhage and contamination; having started in abdominal trauma, it quickly spread out of the abdomen and the context of traumatic pathology.
普通外科医生是否还需要准备妇产科,反之亦然?
各种外科专科的发展和他们各自的培训计划,加上住院医师时间的缩短,导致了他们与我们所说的母专业——普通外科的分离。在某些情况下,像妇产科,至少在我的国家,这已经成为全面的,在医院的临床实践中有反射。同样,普外科的培训已经从接触其他器官、系统和解剖区域的手术中抽离出来,越来越多地关注消化道病理和强调腹腔镜方法,这可能使普外科医生自己对急性妇科或产科病理的准备不足。虽然,在选择性手术实践中,一般外科和妇科团队之间倾向于采用一种方法,建立密切合作,特别是在卵巢肿瘤腹膜播散治疗方面,但在紧急情况下,还有更多的工作要做。以我为例,在30多年的临床实践中,作为一名普通外科医生和急诊外科医生,在剖宫产手术的背景下,被叫到手术室(有时是外围手术室)帮助解决复杂的情况并不罕见,几乎总是出血性质的。其中,子宫切开时的子宫动脉病变和腹壁下血管、动脉、静脉病变,由于牵开器,特别是腹壁的横向切口,这些病变具有不易识别的特殊性,因为它们主要产生腹膜后出血,临床表现稍晚。主要是由于相关的凝血功能障碍,很多时候需要采取损害控制策略[2],最初进行简短的手术干预。不要忘记许多其他情况,如消化道或输尿管的情况,这些情况非常严重,在年轻女性中应该引起双方更大的反思;对于产科医生来说,在他们各自的形成计划中重新引入普通外科培训,或者相反,对于与急诊有关的普通外科医生来说,并不总是熟悉他们。[2]该策略包括最初的简易手术干预,其唯一目的是解决出血和污染;从腹部创伤开始,它迅速蔓延到腹部和创伤病理的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信