The Russian 'Flat Tax' Reform

A. Ivanova, M. Keen, Alexander Klemm
{"title":"The Russian 'Flat Tax' Reform","authors":"A. Ivanova, M. Keen, Alexander Klemm","doi":"10.1111/J.1468-0327.2005.00143.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"type=\"main\" xml:lang=\"en\"> In 2001, Russia dramatically reduced its higher rates of personal income tax (PIT), establishing a single marginal rate at the low level of 13%. In the following year, real revenue from the PIT increased by about 26%. This ‘flat tax’ experience has attracted much attention (and emulation), making it perhaps the most important tax reform of recent years. But it has been little studied. This paper asks whether the strong performance of PIT revenue was itself a consequence of this reform, using both macro evidence and, in particular, micro level data on the experiences of individuals and households affected by the reform to varying degrees. It concludes that there is no evidence of a strong supply side effect of the reform. Compliance, however, does appear to have improved quite substantially – by about one third, according to our estimates – though it remains unclear whether this was due to the parametric tax reform or to accompanying changes in enforcement. — Anna Ivanova, Michael Keen and Alexander Klemm","PeriodicalId":236508,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"178","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-0327.2005.00143.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 178

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="en"> In 2001, Russia dramatically reduced its higher rates of personal income tax (PIT), establishing a single marginal rate at the low level of 13%. In the following year, real revenue from the PIT increased by about 26%. This ‘flat tax’ experience has attracted much attention (and emulation), making it perhaps the most important tax reform of recent years. But it has been little studied. This paper asks whether the strong performance of PIT revenue was itself a consequence of this reform, using both macro evidence and, in particular, micro level data on the experiences of individuals and households affected by the reform to varying degrees. It concludes that there is no evidence of a strong supply side effect of the reform. Compliance, however, does appear to have improved quite substantially – by about one third, according to our estimates – though it remains unclear whether this was due to the parametric tax reform or to accompanying changes in enforcement. — Anna Ivanova, Michael Keen and Alexander Klemm
俄罗斯的“单一税”改革
type="main" xml:lang="en"> 2001年,俄罗斯大幅降低了其较高的个人所得税(PIT)税率,建立了13%的单一边际税率。在接下来的一年里,PIT的实际收入增长了约26%。这种“单一税”的经验吸引了很多关注(和效仿),使其成为近年来最重要的税收改革。但很少有人对此进行研究。本文利用宏观证据,特别是受改革不同程度影响的个人和家庭经历的微观数据,探讨PIT收入的强劲表现本身是否是改革的结果。报告的结论是,没有证据表明改革产生了强大的供给侧效应。然而,合规情况似乎确实有了相当大的改善——根据我们的估计,提高了约三分之一——尽管尚不清楚这是由于参数税制改革还是执法方面的相应变化。——安娜·伊万诺娃、迈克尔·基恩和亚历山大·克莱姆
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信