Ecological Economics vs Economic(al) Ecology

G. Kharlamova
{"title":"Ecological Economics vs Economic(al) Ecology","authors":"G. Kharlamova","doi":"10.17721/1728-2667.2015/174-9/14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently world faces the dilemma - ecological economy or economic(al) ecology. The researchers produce hundreds of surveys on the topic. However the analyses of recent most cited simulations had shown the diversity of results. Thus, for some states the Kuznets environmental curve has place, for others - no. Same could be said about different years for the same state. It provokes the necessity of drawing new group analyses to reveal the tendencies and relationships between economic and environmental factors. Most flexible and mirror factor of environmental sustainability is the volume of CO2 emissions. The econometric analysis was used for detecting the economic impact on this indicator at the global level and in the spectra of group of states depending on their income. The hypothesis of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for the analysed data is rejected. Real GDP per capita impact on carbon dioxide emissions is considered only at the global level. The impact of openness of the economy is weak. Rejection happened also to the hypothesis that for the developed countries there is a reverse dependence between the environmental pollution and economic openness. Indicator \"energy consumption per capita\" impacts on greenhouse gas emissions only in countries with high income. Whereby it should be noted that the more developed a country is, the more elastic is this influence. These results have a potential usage for environmental policy regulation and climate strategy.","PeriodicalId":188091,"journal":{"name":"Systems Ecology eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Ecology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2015/174-9/14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Currently world faces the dilemma - ecological economy or economic(al) ecology. The researchers produce hundreds of surveys on the topic. However the analyses of recent most cited simulations had shown the diversity of results. Thus, for some states the Kuznets environmental curve has place, for others - no. Same could be said about different years for the same state. It provokes the necessity of drawing new group analyses to reveal the tendencies and relationships between economic and environmental factors. Most flexible and mirror factor of environmental sustainability is the volume of CO2 emissions. The econometric analysis was used for detecting the economic impact on this indicator at the global level and in the spectra of group of states depending on their income. The hypothesis of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for the analysed data is rejected. Real GDP per capita impact on carbon dioxide emissions is considered only at the global level. The impact of openness of the economy is weak. Rejection happened also to the hypothesis that for the developed countries there is a reverse dependence between the environmental pollution and economic openness. Indicator "energy consumption per capita" impacts on greenhouse gas emissions only in countries with high income. Whereby it should be noted that the more developed a country is, the more elastic is this influence. These results have a potential usage for environmental policy regulation and climate strategy.
生态经济学vs经济生态学
当前世界面临着生态经济与经济生态的两难选择。研究人员就这个话题做了数百份调查。然而,对最近被引用最多的模拟的分析显示了结果的多样性。因此,对于某些状态,库兹涅茨环境曲线有位置,而对于其他状态,则没有。同一州的不同年份也是如此。为了揭示经济与环境因素之间的趋势和关系,有必要进行新的群体分析。最灵活和反映环境可持续性的因素是二氧化碳排放量。计量经济学分析用于在全球层面和根据其收入的国家组光谱中检测对该指标的经济影响。对所分析的数据否定了环境库兹涅茨曲线存在的假设。实际人均GDP对二氧化碳排放的影响仅在全球层面上考虑。经济开放的影响是微弱的。对于发达国家而言,环境污染与经济开放之间存在反向依赖关系的假设也遭到了否定。指标“人均能源消耗”仅在高收入国家对温室气体排放产生影响。因此,应该指出的是,一个国家越发达,这种影响就越有弹性。这些结果对环境政策调控和气候战略具有潜在的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信