Legitimacy and legality "Habermas questioning"

prof. Bjarne Melkevik (Author), translated by Mr. Judge Ayman Awad Awad Elkholy
{"title":"Legitimacy and legality \"Habermas questioning\"","authors":"prof. Bjarne Melkevik (Author), translated by Mr. Judge Ayman Awad Awad Elkholy","doi":"10.21608/ijarlg.2023.307454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Habermas seeks to renew our understanding of \"legitimacy\" and \"legality\" by including their relationship and problematicism within a concept of law that is exclusively relevant to democratic processes. We suggest here thinking about this concept in three phases: first: defending legal modernity as a horizon for democratic self-legislation, second: by looking at legitimacy as a result of democratic processes, third: presenting the issue of legality as an issue related to democratic processes and in a dependent relationship with them. Finally, the author insists on the legal-philosophical contributions that this theory has made to rethink our legal modernity. The issues surrounding the issue of legitimacy and legality are still the focus of contemporary reflections in legal philosophy, so if we can admit that the problem involves a long and interesting history in which large sections of Western legal philosophy are drawn, then our contemporary philosophical tools, as well as our democratic experiences, seem to us today More conducive to understanding these issues intellectually. The","PeriodicalId":120749,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research on Law and Governance","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research on Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ijarlg.2023.307454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Habermas seeks to renew our understanding of "legitimacy" and "legality" by including their relationship and problematicism within a concept of law that is exclusively relevant to democratic processes. We suggest here thinking about this concept in three phases: first: defending legal modernity as a horizon for democratic self-legislation, second: by looking at legitimacy as a result of democratic processes, third: presenting the issue of legality as an issue related to democratic processes and in a dependent relationship with them. Finally, the author insists on the legal-philosophical contributions that this theory has made to rethink our legal modernity. The issues surrounding the issue of legitimacy and legality are still the focus of contemporary reflections in legal philosophy, so if we can admit that the problem involves a long and interesting history in which large sections of Western legal philosophy are drawn, then our contemporary philosophical tools, as well as our democratic experiences, seem to us today More conducive to understanding these issues intellectually. The
合法性与合法性“哈贝马斯质疑”
哈贝马斯试图更新我们对“合法性”和“合法性”的理解,将它们的关系和问题主义纳入一个专门与民主进程相关的法律概念。我们建议分三个阶段来思考这个概念:第一:将法律现代性作为民主自我立法的视界进行辩护;第二:将合法性视为民主进程的结果;第三:将合法性问题视为与民主进程相关的问题,并与民主进程建立依赖关系。最后,笔者强调了这一理论对反思我国法律现代性的法哲学贡献。围绕合法性和合法性问题的问题仍然是当代法哲学反思的焦点,因此,如果我们能够承认,这个问题涉及一段漫长而有趣的历史,其中描绘了西方法律哲学的大部分内容,那么我们当代的哲学工具,以及我们的民主经验,在我们今天看来,似乎更有助于从理性上理解这些问题。的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信