Analysis of the Factors Influencing Maize Postharvest Losses and Effect of Agricultural Inputs Supply on Productivity in Rwanda: A Case of Gatsibo and Nyagatare

Ntabakirabose Gaspard, Tuyisenge Jean Claude, Tumukunde Ritha, Izamuhaye Jean Claude, D. Mburu, Majuga Jean Claude Noel, M. Mbabazize
{"title":"Analysis of the Factors Influencing Maize Postharvest Losses and Effect of Agricultural Inputs Supply on Productivity in Rwanda: A Case of Gatsibo and Nyagatare","authors":"Ntabakirabose Gaspard, Tuyisenge Jean Claude, Tumukunde Ritha, Izamuhaye Jean Claude, D. Mburu, Majuga Jean Claude Noel, M. Mbabazize","doi":"10.11648/J.AJMSE.20210606.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the world, food demand and an increasing population remains a major global concern, where more than one-third of food is lost or wasted in postharvest operations. Reducing the postharvest losses, especially in developing countries including Rwanda, could be a sustainable solution to increase food availability, reduce pressure on natural resources, eliminate hunger and improve farmers’ livelihoods. The main objective of this study is to conduct an economic analysis of the factors influencing maize postharvest losses and effect of agricultural input supply on productivity of smallholder’s farmers in Rwanda. A Case of Gatsibo and Nyagatare districts. A multistage sampling technique was employed involving purposive sampling of two districts in Eastern Province and three sectors in each district. A sample size of 110 respondents were proportionally selected from 562 farmers of maize crops in six sectors of the study area. Multiple regression analysis was employed to identify the factors influencing maize production losses; budgetary technique analysis was used to evaluate the profitability of improved seeds, while difference in difference method was employed to determine the effect of agricultural inputs supply to farmers of the study area. The results indicated that variables such as weeds, pests, diseases, and rodents have statistically significant influenced maize postharvest losses in study area at (p values <0.01). While the distance to market and storage facilities influenced the maize postharvest losses at 5% and 10% respectively. The most destructive rodent pests in study area like different corners of Rwanda are multimammate rat, and birds. The overall average maize yield is 2274 kg per ha for both before and after agricultural inputs delivery to the farmers of Gatsibo and Nyagatare districts. The difference in yields between before and after for the farmers is highly significant (p<0.01). The gross margin before and after is 174,895 per ha and 289,956 per ha respectively. The p-value for test of difference in means of gross margin for before and after was 0.01. This suggests that the gross margin for users of agricultural improved seeds is significantly higher after inputs delivery than before. The figure showed that the difference is 1034 kg/ha of yield, and 115061 of gross margin indicating that maize crop is more profitable in study are.","PeriodicalId":438321,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Management Science and Engineering","volume":"2018 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Management Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJMSE.20210606.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the world, food demand and an increasing population remains a major global concern, where more than one-third of food is lost or wasted in postharvest operations. Reducing the postharvest losses, especially in developing countries including Rwanda, could be a sustainable solution to increase food availability, reduce pressure on natural resources, eliminate hunger and improve farmers’ livelihoods. The main objective of this study is to conduct an economic analysis of the factors influencing maize postharvest losses and effect of agricultural input supply on productivity of smallholder’s farmers in Rwanda. A Case of Gatsibo and Nyagatare districts. A multistage sampling technique was employed involving purposive sampling of two districts in Eastern Province and three sectors in each district. A sample size of 110 respondents were proportionally selected from 562 farmers of maize crops in six sectors of the study area. Multiple regression analysis was employed to identify the factors influencing maize production losses; budgetary technique analysis was used to evaluate the profitability of improved seeds, while difference in difference method was employed to determine the effect of agricultural inputs supply to farmers of the study area. The results indicated that variables such as weeds, pests, diseases, and rodents have statistically significant influenced maize postharvest losses in study area at (p values <0.01). While the distance to market and storage facilities influenced the maize postharvest losses at 5% and 10% respectively. The most destructive rodent pests in study area like different corners of Rwanda are multimammate rat, and birds. The overall average maize yield is 2274 kg per ha for both before and after agricultural inputs delivery to the farmers of Gatsibo and Nyagatare districts. The difference in yields between before and after for the farmers is highly significant (p<0.01). The gross margin before and after is 174,895 per ha and 289,956 per ha respectively. The p-value for test of difference in means of gross margin for before and after was 0.01. This suggests that the gross margin for users of agricultural improved seeds is significantly higher after inputs delivery than before. The figure showed that the difference is 1034 kg/ha of yield, and 115061 of gross margin indicating that maize crop is more profitable in study are.
卢旺达玉米采后损失影响因素及农业投入品供给对生产力的影响分析——以加茨博和尼亚加塔雷为例
在世界范围内,粮食需求和不断增长的人口仍然是全球关注的主要问题,全球有三分之一以上的粮食在采后操作中损失或浪费。减少收获后损失,特别是在包括卢旺达在内的发展中国家,可能是增加粮食供应、减轻自然资源压力、消除饥饿和改善农民生计的可持续解决方案。本研究的主要目的是对影响卢旺达玉米收获后损失的因素和农业投入供应对小农生产力的影响进行经济分析。Gatsibo和Nyagatare地区的一个案例。采用多阶段抽样技术,在东部省的两个区和每个区的三个部门进行有目的抽样。按比例从研究区六个部门的562名玉米作物农民中选出110名受访者。采用多元回归分析确定影响玉米生产损失的因素;采用预算技术分析评价改良种子的盈利能力,采用差中差法确定研究区农业投入品供给对农民的影响。结果表明,杂草、病虫害、鼠害等因素对研究区玉米采后损失有显著影响(p值<0.01)。而市场距离和储存设施对玉米采后损失的影响分别为5%和10%。在卢旺达不同角落的研究区,最具破坏性的啮齿动物害虫是多目鼠类和鸟类。在向Gatsibo和Nyagatare地区的农民交付农业投入之前和之后,总体平均玉米产量为每公顷2274公斤。农户产量前后差异极显著(p<0.01)。前后毛利率分别为174,895 /公顷和289,956 /公顷。检验前后毛利率均值差异的p值为0.01。这表明,在投入物交付后,农业改良种子用户的毛利率明显高于之前。由图可知,产量差为1034 kg/ hm2,毛利率差为115061 kg/ hm2,说明研究区玉米作物更有利可图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信