Traditional and Hybrid Access Control Models: A Detailed Survey

Muhammad Umar Aftab, A. Hamza, Ariyo Oluwasanmi, Xuyun Nie, M. Sarfraz, Danish Shehzad, Zhiguang Qin, Ammar Rafiq
{"title":"Traditional and Hybrid Access Control Models: A Detailed Survey","authors":"Muhammad Umar Aftab, A. Hamza, Ariyo Oluwasanmi, Xuyun Nie, M. Sarfraz, Danish Shehzad, Zhiguang Qin, Ammar Rafiq","doi":"10.1155/2022/1560885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access control mechanisms define the level of access to the resources among specified users. It distinguishes the users as authorized or unauthorized based on appropriate policies. Several traditional and hybrid access control models have been proposed in previous researches over the last few decades. In this study, we provide a detailed survey of access control models and compare the traditional and hybrid access control models based on their access control criteria. This survey focuses on the growing literature of access control models and summarizes it through comparative analysis, identifying limitations and illustrating the advantages of both traditional and hybrid models. This study will help the researchers to get a deep understanding of the traditional and hybrid access control models.","PeriodicalId":167643,"journal":{"name":"Secur. Commun. Networks","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Secur. Commun. Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1560885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Access control mechanisms define the level of access to the resources among specified users. It distinguishes the users as authorized or unauthorized based on appropriate policies. Several traditional and hybrid access control models have been proposed in previous researches over the last few decades. In this study, we provide a detailed survey of access control models and compare the traditional and hybrid access control models based on their access control criteria. This survey focuses on the growing literature of access control models and summarizes it through comparative analysis, identifying limitations and illustrating the advantages of both traditional and hybrid models. This study will help the researchers to get a deep understanding of the traditional and hybrid access control models.
传统和混合访问控制模型:详细调查
访问控制机制定义了指定用户对资源的访问级别。它根据适当的策略区分授权用户和未授权用户。在过去几十年的研究中提出了几种传统的和混合的访问控制模型。在这项研究中,我们提供了详细的调查访问控制模型,并比较传统和混合访问控制模型基于他们的访问控制标准。本调查重点关注越来越多的访问控制模型文献,并通过比较分析进行总结,找出局限性,并说明传统模型和混合模型的优点。本研究将有助于研究者深入了解传统存取控制模型与混合存取控制模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信