“Megalos mastoras and his work” Pekich's story of infection and a masterpiece

Jovana M. Kopanja
{"title":"“Megalos mastoras and his work” Pekich's story of infection and a masterpiece","authors":"Jovana M. Kopanja","doi":"10.30970/sls.2021.70.3748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Аbstract: “Megalos Mastoras and His Work”, the story that opens Pekić’s New Jerusalem, will be analyzed from the aspect of the divine (demiurgic) nature of the work of art, as well as through the representation of an Artist as God. Five artists appear in the story: Cyrus-Angelos, the icon painter Nicodemus, Janibeg (artist of war), the biographer of the story and the Greek anonymous at the beginning of the story and all of them are simultaneously sublime and tragic. A special accent was certainly placed on the figure of Megalos Mastoras, through whose work the difference between the artist and the craftsman – technites and kalytechnis – was shown. Pekić's hero reaches the highest level of freedom when he is given the opportunity to decide not only his fate and that of his part, but also the fate of all the inhabitants of Tegeja. In contrast to the story of Creation, there is a story of Chaos, depicted through the concept of contagion, i.e., a plague, symbolizing destruction. Therefore, this paper will place a special emphasis on the topic of contagion, which nowadays, in a world stricken by the coronavirus pandemic outbreak, has been transforming death into a depersonalized, collective phenomenon. Apart from the mythological background and anti-utopian (i.e., “dystopian”) portrayal of mankind, this story indicates Pekić views mankind’s fall as inevitable, taking it as given. A special place in the story is dedicated to a narrative questioning the credibility of Cyrus Dumetrius’s biography, recorded by the writer. On the other hand, the story is linked with palimpsest, where a story originates from an earlier piece of writing, i.e. two pieces of text are intertwined and referring to one another. Skillfully maneuvering facts, Pekić implies that it’s not the reality that carries the greatest significance, but rather the idea it originated from. Bearing in mind the concept of a story within a story, the readership is under impression that Pekić’s “Megalos Mastoras and His Work” belongs to the type of stories that are “eternal, inalterable, and momentous”. Once again, masterfully, in a manner of a prophet, affirming himself as a visionary, Pekićgives us a story with a “force of fate”, that way possibly taking us back to the roots of art, “when it was still meaningful”. Key words: Pekić, Megalos Mastoras and his work, Artist, God, Story, mimesis, idea Ahmetagić, J., 2019. Paranoid confession and the will for the truth in New Jerusalem by Borislav Pekić. Baština, 47. Priština-Leposavić: Institute for Serbian Culture, pp.3–17. (In Serbian) Branković, S. 1977. Asceticism as a way of life and action.U: Ivanović, R. (ur.), Hommage to Danilo Kish: collection of papers III. Podgorica: Kulturno-prosvjetna zajednica; Budva: High school “Danilo Kiš”.(In Serbian) Damjanov, S., 2009. Utopian-anti-utopian reader Borislav Pekić. U: Tešić, G., Pijanović, P., Jerkov, A. (ur.), The poetics of Borislav Pekić: an interweaving of genres. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, pp.479–484. (In Serbian) Delić, J., 2002. (Auto)poetic layer in \"New Jerusalem\" by Borislav Pekić. U: Palavestra, P. (ur.), Monument to Borislav Pekić, on the occasion of the seventieth anniversary of his birth. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, pp.39–62. (In Serbian) Pantić, M., 1997. The tragic paradoxes of Borislav Pekić or the ironic effects of storytelling in the book New Jerusalem. Podgorica: Cultural and educational community of Podgorica, pp.71–81. (In Serbian) Pantić, M., 2002. Civil novel by Borislav Pekić. U: Palavestra, P. (ur.), Monument to Borislav Pekić, on the occasion of the seventieth anniversary of his birth. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, pp.91–98. (In Serbian) Pekić, B., 1984. The destruction of reality – the myth of man, Selected works of Borislav Pekić. Belgrade: Partizanska knjiga. (In Serbian) Pekić, B., 2001. New Jerusalem. Novi Sad: Solaris. (In Serbian) Popović, T., 2007. Dictionary of literary terms. Belgrade: Logos Art. (In Serbian) Radonjić, G., 2003. A wreath of stories. Belgrade: Prosveta. (In Serbian) Radulović, M., 2002. Aesthetic and autopoetic reflections of Borislav Pekić. U: Palavestra, P. (ur.), Monument to Borislav Pekić, on the occasion of the seventieth anniversary of his birth. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. pp.1–38. (In Serbian) Tatarenko, A., 2005. Genre mosaic of New Jerusalem by B. Pekić. U: Karanović, Z., Radulović, S. (ur.), Žanrovi srpske književnosti. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakulet: Orfeus. pp.351–365. (In Serbian) Tatarenko, A., 2008. In the vicious triangle Crnjanski, Kiš, Pekić: essays and studies. Zaječar: Matična biblioteka Svetozar Marković. (In Serbian) Tatarenko, A., 2009. Gothic games with a pipe: Pekić's literary dialogue with Kiš. U: Tešić, G., Pijanović, P., Jerkov, A. (ur.), The poetics of Borislav Pekić: an interweaving of genres. Belgrade: Institute for Literature and Art: Službeni glasnik, pp.197–210. (In Serbian) Teodorović, J., 2015. Utopian, Mythological and Historical Discourse of Borislav Pekić and Julian Barnes. PhD dissertation. Kragujevac: Faculty of Philology and Arts. (In Serbian) Vladušić, S., 2008. Artistic ethics and politics of duration in Pekić's story Megalos Mastoras and his work.U: Bošković, D. (ur.), Collection of works Literature, society, politics, book 2. Kragujevac: Grafostil, pp.57–66. (In Serbian)","PeriodicalId":422873,"journal":{"name":"Problems of slavonic studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of slavonic studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/sls.2021.70.3748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Аbstract: “Megalos Mastoras and His Work”, the story that opens Pekić’s New Jerusalem, will be analyzed from the aspect of the divine (demiurgic) nature of the work of art, as well as through the representation of an Artist as God. Five artists appear in the story: Cyrus-Angelos, the icon painter Nicodemus, Janibeg (artist of war), the biographer of the story and the Greek anonymous at the beginning of the story and all of them are simultaneously sublime and tragic. A special accent was certainly placed on the figure of Megalos Mastoras, through whose work the difference between the artist and the craftsman – technites and kalytechnis – was shown. Pekić's hero reaches the highest level of freedom when he is given the opportunity to decide not only his fate and that of his part, but also the fate of all the inhabitants of Tegeja. In contrast to the story of Creation, there is a story of Chaos, depicted through the concept of contagion, i.e., a plague, symbolizing destruction. Therefore, this paper will place a special emphasis on the topic of contagion, which nowadays, in a world stricken by the coronavirus pandemic outbreak, has been transforming death into a depersonalized, collective phenomenon. Apart from the mythological background and anti-utopian (i.e., “dystopian”) portrayal of mankind, this story indicates Pekić views mankind’s fall as inevitable, taking it as given. A special place in the story is dedicated to a narrative questioning the credibility of Cyrus Dumetrius’s biography, recorded by the writer. On the other hand, the story is linked with palimpsest, where a story originates from an earlier piece of writing, i.e. two pieces of text are intertwined and referring to one another. Skillfully maneuvering facts, Pekić implies that it’s not the reality that carries the greatest significance, but rather the idea it originated from. Bearing in mind the concept of a story within a story, the readership is under impression that Pekić’s “Megalos Mastoras and His Work” belongs to the type of stories that are “eternal, inalterable, and momentous”. Once again, masterfully, in a manner of a prophet, affirming himself as a visionary, Pekićgives us a story with a “force of fate”, that way possibly taking us back to the roots of art, “when it was still meaningful”. Key words: Pekić, Megalos Mastoras and his work, Artist, God, Story, mimesis, idea Ahmetagić, J., 2019. Paranoid confession and the will for the truth in New Jerusalem by Borislav Pekić. Baština, 47. Priština-Leposavić: Institute for Serbian Culture, pp.3–17. (In Serbian) Branković, S. 1977. Asceticism as a way of life and action.U: Ivanović, R. (ur.), Hommage to Danilo Kish: collection of papers III. Podgorica: Kulturno-prosvjetna zajednica; Budva: High school “Danilo Kiš”.(In Serbian) Damjanov, S., 2009. Utopian-anti-utopian reader Borislav Pekić. U: Tešić, G., Pijanović, P., Jerkov, A. (ur.), The poetics of Borislav Pekić: an interweaving of genres. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, pp.479–484. (In Serbian) Delić, J., 2002. (Auto)poetic layer in "New Jerusalem" by Borislav Pekić. U: Palavestra, P. (ur.), Monument to Borislav Pekić, on the occasion of the seventieth anniversary of his birth. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, pp.39–62. (In Serbian) Pantić, M., 1997. The tragic paradoxes of Borislav Pekić or the ironic effects of storytelling in the book New Jerusalem. Podgorica: Cultural and educational community of Podgorica, pp.71–81. (In Serbian) Pantić, M., 2002. Civil novel by Borislav Pekić. U: Palavestra, P. (ur.), Monument to Borislav Pekić, on the occasion of the seventieth anniversary of his birth. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, pp.91–98. (In Serbian) Pekić, B., 1984. The destruction of reality – the myth of man, Selected works of Borislav Pekić. Belgrade: Partizanska knjiga. (In Serbian) Pekić, B., 2001. New Jerusalem. Novi Sad: Solaris. (In Serbian) Popović, T., 2007. Dictionary of literary terms. Belgrade: Logos Art. (In Serbian) Radonjić, G., 2003. A wreath of stories. Belgrade: Prosveta. (In Serbian) Radulović, M., 2002. Aesthetic and autopoetic reflections of Borislav Pekić. U: Palavestra, P. (ur.), Monument to Borislav Pekić, on the occasion of the seventieth anniversary of his birth. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. pp.1–38. (In Serbian) Tatarenko, A., 2005. Genre mosaic of New Jerusalem by B. Pekić. U: Karanović, Z., Radulović, S. (ur.), Žanrovi srpske književnosti. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakulet: Orfeus. pp.351–365. (In Serbian) Tatarenko, A., 2008. In the vicious triangle Crnjanski, Kiš, Pekić: essays and studies. Zaječar: Matična biblioteka Svetozar Marković. (In Serbian) Tatarenko, A., 2009. Gothic games with a pipe: Pekić's literary dialogue with Kiš. U: Tešić, G., Pijanović, P., Jerkov, A. (ur.), The poetics of Borislav Pekić: an interweaving of genres. Belgrade: Institute for Literature and Art: Službeni glasnik, pp.197–210. (In Serbian) Teodorović, J., 2015. Utopian, Mythological and Historical Discourse of Borislav Pekić and Julian Barnes. PhD dissertation. Kragujevac: Faculty of Philology and Arts. (In Serbian) Vladušić, S., 2008. Artistic ethics and politics of duration in Pekić's story Megalos Mastoras and his work.U: Bošković, D. (ur.), Collection of works Literature, society, politics, book 2. Kragujevac: Grafostil, pp.57–66. (In Serbian)
" Megalos mastoras和他的作品" Pekich的感染故事和杰作
Аbstract:“Megalos Mastoras和他的作品”,这个故事开启了pekiki的《新耶路撒冷》,将从艺术作品的神性(demiurgic)性质方面进行分析,以及通过艺术家作为上帝的表现。故事中出现了五位艺术家:Cyrus-Angelos,偶像画家Nicodemus, Janibeg(战争艺术家),故事的传记作者和故事开头的希腊匿名者,他们都是崇高和悲剧的。Megalos Mastoras的形象当然被特别强调了,通过他的作品,艺术家和工匠(technites和kalytechnis)之间的区别被展示了出来。pekiki的英雄达到了自由的最高境界,他不仅有机会决定自己的命运和他的角色的命运,而且还决定了Tegeja所有居民的命运。与创世的故事相反,有一个混沌的故事,通过传染的概念来描述,即瘟疫,象征着毁灭。因此,本文将特别强调传染的主题,在当今受冠状病毒大流行影响的世界中,传染已经将死亡转变为一种非个性化的集体现象。除了神话背景和对人类的反乌托邦(即“反乌托邦”)描绘之外,这个故事表明佩基奇认为人类的衰落是不可避免的,认为它是理所当然的。故事中有一个特别的地方,是关于质疑塞勒斯·杜梅特里乌斯传记可信度的叙述。另一方面,故事与重写本联系在一起,在重写本中,故事起源于更早的一篇文章,即两篇文章交织在一起,相互引用。佩基奇巧妙地操纵了事实,他暗示,最重要的不是现实本身,而是它所产生的想法。考虑到故事中故事的概念,读者的印象是佩基奇的《梅加罗斯·马斯托拉斯和他的作品》属于“永恒、不变和重大”的故事类型。再一次,巧妙地,以一种先知的方式,肯定自己是一个有远见的人,Pekićgives我们一个故事与“命运的力量”,这种方式可能带我们回到艺术的根源,“当它仍然有意义”。关键词:pekiki, Megalos Mastoras及其作品,艺术家,上帝,故事,模仿,想法,ahmetagiki, J., 2019波里斯拉夫·佩基奇在新耶路撒冷的偏执自白与追求真相的意志。英航š蒂娜,47岁。Priština-Leposavić:塞尔维亚文化研究所,第3 - 17页。(塞尔维亚语)布兰科维奇,S. 1977。禁欲主义是一种生活方式和行为方式。U:伊万诺维奇,R. (ur.),《向丹尼洛·基什致敬:论文集3》。波德戈里察:文化-prosvjetna zajednica;布德瓦:高中“丹尼洛·基什”。(塞尔维亚语)Damjanov, S., 2009。乌托邦-反乌托邦的读者鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇。U: Tešić, G., pijanoviki, P., Jerkov, A. (ur.), Borislav pekiki的诗学:流派的交织。贝尔格莱德:Službeni glasnik,第479 - 484页。(塞尔维亚文)deliki, J., 2002。(自)鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇《新耶路撒冷》中的诗意层。U: Palavestra, P. (ur.),《鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇纪念碑》,纪念他诞辰七十周年。贝尔格莱德:塞尔维亚科学和艺术学院,第39 - 62页。(塞尔维亚文)潘蒂奇,M., 1997。鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇的悲剧悖论或者《新耶路撒冷》中故事叙述的讽刺效果。波德戈里察:波德戈里察文化教育社区,第71 - 81页。(塞尔维亚语)潘蒂奇,M., 2002。鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇的民间小说。U: Palavestra, P. (ur.),《鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇纪念碑》,纪念他诞辰七十周年。贝尔格莱德:塞尔维亚科学和艺术学院,第91 - 98页。(塞尔维亚文)佩基奇,1984年。《现实的毁灭——人的神话》,鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇选集。贝尔格莱德:南斯拉夫游击队。(塞尔维亚文)佩基奇,2001年。新耶路撒冷。诺维萨德:Solaris。(塞尔维亚语)波波维奇,T., 2007。文学术语词典。贝尔格莱德:标志艺术。(塞尔维亚语)radonjiki, G., 2003。一圈故事。贝尔格莱德:Prosveta。(塞尔维亚文)raduloviki, M., 2002。鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇的美学与自生学反思。U: Palavestra, P. (ur.),《鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇纪念碑》,纪念他诞辰七十周年。贝尔格莱德:塞尔维亚科学和艺术学院。pp.1-38。(塞尔维亚文)Tatarenko, A., 2005。B. pekiki的《新耶路撒冷》类型马赛克。U: karanoviki, Z., raduloviki, S. (ur.), Žanrovi srpske književnosti。Novi Sad: Filozofski fakulet: Orfeus。pp.351 - 365。(塞尔维亚文)Tatarenko, A., 2008。在恶性三角关系中,克里扬斯基,基什,佩基奇:论文和研究。zaje<e:1>: matina biblioteka Svetozar markovovic。(塞尔维亚语)Tatarenko, A., 2009。带烟斗的哥特式游戏:佩基奇与基奇的文学对话。U: Tešić, G., pijanoviki, P., Jerkov, A. (ur.), Borislav pekiki的诗学:流派的交织。贝尔格莱德:文学和艺术研究所:Službeni格拉斯尼克,第197 - 210页。(塞尔维亚文)teodoroviki, J., 2015。 鲍里斯拉夫·佩基奇和朱利安·巴恩斯的乌托邦、神话与历史话语。博士学位论文。克拉古耶瓦茨:文学和艺术学院。(塞尔维亚语)Vladušić, s.s., 2008年。佩基奇小说《梅加洛斯·马斯托拉斯》及其作品中的艺术伦理与持续政治。U: Bošković,博士(硕士),著作集《文学、社会、政治》第2卷。Kragujevac: Grafostil,第57 - 66页。(塞尔维亚)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信