Estimating Causal Effects on Social Networks

L. Forastiere, F. Mealli, Albert Wu, E. Airoldi
{"title":"Estimating Causal Effects on Social Networks","authors":"L. Forastiere, F. Mealli, Albert Wu, E. Airoldi","doi":"10.1109/DSAA.2018.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most real-world systems units are interconnected and can be represented as networks consisting of nodes and edges. For instance, in social systems individuals can have social ties, family or financial relationships. In settings where some units are exposed to a treatment and its effects spills over connected units, estimating both the direct effect of the treatment and spillover effects presents several challenges. First, assumptions on the way and the extent to which spillover effects occur along the observed network are required. Second, in observational studies, where the treatment assignment is not under the control of the investigator, confounding and homophily are potential threats to the identification and estimation of causal effects on networks. Here, we make two structural assumptions: i) neighborhood interference, which assumes interference to operate only through a function of the the immediate neighbors' treatments, ii) unconfoundedness of the individual and neighborhood treatment, which rules out the presence of unmeasured confounding variables, including those driving homophily. Under these assumptions we develop a new covariate-adjustment estimator for treatment and spillover effects in observational studies on networks. Estimation is based on a generalized propensity score that balances individual and neighborhood covariates across units under different levels of individual treatment and of exposure to neighbors' treatment. Adjustment for propensity score is performed using a penalized spline regression. Inference capitalizes on a three-step Bayesian procedure which allows taking into account the uncertainty in the propensity score estimation and avoiding model feedback. Finally, correlation of interacting units is taken into account using a community detection algorithm and incorporating random effects in the outcome model. All these sources of variability, including variability of treatment assignment, are accounted for in the posterior distribution of finite-sample causal estimands.","PeriodicalId":208455,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2018.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In most real-world systems units are interconnected and can be represented as networks consisting of nodes and edges. For instance, in social systems individuals can have social ties, family or financial relationships. In settings where some units are exposed to a treatment and its effects spills over connected units, estimating both the direct effect of the treatment and spillover effects presents several challenges. First, assumptions on the way and the extent to which spillover effects occur along the observed network are required. Second, in observational studies, where the treatment assignment is not under the control of the investigator, confounding and homophily are potential threats to the identification and estimation of causal effects on networks. Here, we make two structural assumptions: i) neighborhood interference, which assumes interference to operate only through a function of the the immediate neighbors' treatments, ii) unconfoundedness of the individual and neighborhood treatment, which rules out the presence of unmeasured confounding variables, including those driving homophily. Under these assumptions we develop a new covariate-adjustment estimator for treatment and spillover effects in observational studies on networks. Estimation is based on a generalized propensity score that balances individual and neighborhood covariates across units under different levels of individual treatment and of exposure to neighbors' treatment. Adjustment for propensity score is performed using a penalized spline regression. Inference capitalizes on a three-step Bayesian procedure which allows taking into account the uncertainty in the propensity score estimation and avoiding model feedback. Finally, correlation of interacting units is taken into account using a community detection algorithm and incorporating random effects in the outcome model. All these sources of variability, including variability of treatment assignment, are accounted for in the posterior distribution of finite-sample causal estimands.
估计社会网络的因果效应
在大多数现实世界的系统中,单元是相互连接的,可以表示为由节点和边组成的网络。例如,在社会系统中,个人可以有社会关系、家庭或经济关系。在某些单位受到处理且其影响溢出到相连单位的情况下,估计处理的直接影响和溢出效应提出了几个挑战。首先,需要假设溢出效应沿观察到的网络发生的方式和程度。其次,在观察性研究中,治疗分配不在研究者的控制之下,混淆和同质性是识别和估计网络因果效应的潜在威胁。在这里,我们做了两个结构性假设:i)邻域干扰,它假设干扰只通过近邻处理的函数起作用;ii)个体和邻域处理的非混杂性,它排除了未测量的混杂变量的存在,包括那些驱动同质性的变量。在这些假设下,我们开发了一种新的协变量调整估计量,用于网络观察性研究中的处理和溢出效应。估计基于广义倾向评分,该评分在不同水平的个体治疗和暴露于邻居治疗的情况下平衡个体和社区的协变量。使用惩罚样条回归对倾向评分进行调整。推理利用了一个三步贝叶斯过程,该过程允许考虑到倾向评分估计中的不确定性并避免模型反馈。最后,使用社区检测算法考虑相互作用单元的相关性,并将随机效应纳入结果模型。所有这些可变性的来源,包括治疗分配的可变性,都在有限样本因果估计的后验分布中得到了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信