Vascular ring anomalies in cats: 20 cases (2000-2018).

A. Bascuñán, Penny J. Regier, J. Brad Case, Ameet Singh, Ingrid M Balsa, J. Flanders, K. Thieman-Mankin, Kathleen M. Ham
{"title":"Vascular ring anomalies in cats: 20 cases (2000-2018).","authors":"A. Bascuñán, Penny J. Regier, J. Brad Case, Ameet Singh, Ingrid M Balsa, J. Flanders, K. Thieman-Mankin, Kathleen M. Ham","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo report the clinical characteristics, types of vascular ring anomalies (VRA), operative findings, complications, and survival after surgical treatment of cats with VRA.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nRetrospective, multi-institutional case series.\n\n\nANIMALS\nClient- or shelter-owned cats presenting to academic, referral veterinary institutions.\n\n\nMETHODS\nMedical records of cats with VRA that underwent surgical treatment were reviewed. Signalment, relevant medical history, clinical signs, diagnostic imaging, surgical findings, complications, and survival were recorded.\n\n\nRESULTS\nTwenty cats with VRA were included. Vascular ring anomalies were most commonly (75% [15/20]) diagnosed in cats less than 1 year old, with no breed or sex predilection. Regurgitation was the most common clinical sign, present in 18 of 20 (90%) cats. A persistent right aortic arch was diagnosed in 17 of 20 (85%) cats, with concurrent aberrant left subclavian artery in four of the cats. Surgical treatment was associated with survival to discharge in 18 of 20 (90%) cats. Persistent clinical signs were reported in nine of 13 (69%) cats, and radiographic evidence of megaesophagus persisted in four of 13 (31%) cats, with a median follow-up of 275 days after discharge.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPersistent right aortic arch was the most commonly diagnosed VRA in cats in this series, although multiple anomalies were observed. Surgical treatment of VRA in cats was associated with a high survival to discharge, although persistence of clinical signs and megaesophagus was noted in 69% and 31% of the cats, respectively.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nSurgical treatment of VRA in cats is associated with a high survival rate; however, persistence of clinical signs is an expected outcome.","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To report the clinical characteristics, types of vascular ring anomalies (VRA), operative findings, complications, and survival after surgical treatment of cats with VRA. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective, multi-institutional case series. ANIMALS Client- or shelter-owned cats presenting to academic, referral veterinary institutions. METHODS Medical records of cats with VRA that underwent surgical treatment were reviewed. Signalment, relevant medical history, clinical signs, diagnostic imaging, surgical findings, complications, and survival were recorded. RESULTS Twenty cats with VRA were included. Vascular ring anomalies were most commonly (75% [15/20]) diagnosed in cats less than 1 year old, with no breed or sex predilection. Regurgitation was the most common clinical sign, present in 18 of 20 (90%) cats. A persistent right aortic arch was diagnosed in 17 of 20 (85%) cats, with concurrent aberrant left subclavian artery in four of the cats. Surgical treatment was associated with survival to discharge in 18 of 20 (90%) cats. Persistent clinical signs were reported in nine of 13 (69%) cats, and radiographic evidence of megaesophagus persisted in four of 13 (31%) cats, with a median follow-up of 275 days after discharge. CONCLUSION Persistent right aortic arch was the most commonly diagnosed VRA in cats in this series, although multiple anomalies were observed. Surgical treatment of VRA in cats was associated with a high survival to discharge, although persistence of clinical signs and megaesophagus was noted in 69% and 31% of the cats, respectively. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Surgical treatment of VRA in cats is associated with a high survival rate; however, persistence of clinical signs is an expected outcome.
猫血管环异常:20例(2000-2018)。
目的报道猫血管环异常(VRA)的临床特点、类型、手术表现、并发症及术后生存率。研究设计:回顾性、多机构病例系列。动物诊所或收容所拥有的猫向学术、转诊兽医机构展示。方法对手术治疗的VRA猫病历进行回顾性分析。记录信号、相关病史、临床体征、诊断影像、手术结果、并发症和生存率。结果共纳入20只VRA猫。血管环异常在1岁以下的猫中最常见(75%[15/20]),没有品种或性别偏好。反流是最常见的临床症状,20只猫中有18只(90%)出现反流。20只猫中有17只(85%)被诊断为持续的右主动脉弓,其中4只猫同时伴有左锁骨下动脉异常。手术治疗与20只猫中的18只(90%)存活至出院相关。13只猫中有9只(69%)报告了持续的临床症状,13只猫中有4只(31%)存在食管萎缩的放射证据,出院后中位随访时间为275天。结论持续的右主动脉弓是本系列猫中最常见的VRA诊断,尽管观察到多种异常。猫的VRA手术治疗与高生存率相关,尽管分别在69%和31%的猫中存在持续的临床症状和食管肥大。临床意义猫VRA手术治疗生存率高;然而,临床症状的持续是预期的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信