Will CoWorking Work?

William L. C. Wheaton, A. Krasikov
{"title":"Will CoWorking Work?","authors":"William L. C. Wheaton, A. Krasikov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3784792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“CoWorking” represents a new way of providing office space to corporate workers. Rather than companies acquiring dedicated space for their workforce at one or a few sites under long term leases (or ownership), companies contract with a “service provider” to have their workers housed “flexibly” at a range of sites for variable terms. In the extreme, companies allow their workers to make their own space arrangements – while picking up the tab. This allows the service provider to operate its office space like a “hotel”. The observation that many traditional offices are significantly underutilized raises the possibility that this new arrangement could save companies on overall occupancy costs. In this paper we analyze this alternative in terms of whether it can provide companies with equal labor productivity at a lower cost – and provide a viable business model for the service provider. Our analysis identifies a number of issues which will significantly impact the ability of this new model to “work”. Empirically, we examine the recent sales prices of office properties that have been structured largely as CoWorking facilities and compare them with a similar sales set of properties using traditional tenancy. Buildings with the new model have lower sales prices and cap rates, suggesting investor concern over the issues which we have identified.","PeriodicalId":331906,"journal":{"name":"MIT Center for Real Estate Research Paper Series","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIT Center for Real Estate Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3784792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

“CoWorking” represents a new way of providing office space to corporate workers. Rather than companies acquiring dedicated space for their workforce at one or a few sites under long term leases (or ownership), companies contract with a “service provider” to have their workers housed “flexibly” at a range of sites for variable terms. In the extreme, companies allow their workers to make their own space arrangements – while picking up the tab. This allows the service provider to operate its office space like a “hotel”. The observation that many traditional offices are significantly underutilized raises the possibility that this new arrangement could save companies on overall occupancy costs. In this paper we analyze this alternative in terms of whether it can provide companies with equal labor productivity at a lower cost – and provide a viable business model for the service provider. Our analysis identifies a number of issues which will significantly impact the ability of this new model to “work”. Empirically, we examine the recent sales prices of office properties that have been structured largely as CoWorking facilities and compare them with a similar sales set of properties using traditional tenancy. Buildings with the new model have lower sales prices and cap rates, suggesting investor concern over the issues which we have identified.
联合办公行得通吗?
“联合办公”代表了一种为企业员工提供办公空间的新方式。公司不是根据长期租约(或所有权)在一个或几个地点为员工购买专用空间,而是与“服务提供商”签订合同,让员工“灵活”地居住在一系列地点,条件各异。在极端情况下,公司允许员工自己安排办公空间,同时自己买单。这使得服务提供商可以像“酒店”一样运营其办公空间。鉴于许多传统办公室的利用严重不足,这种新的安排有可能为公司节省总的占用费用。在本文中,我们分析了这种替代方案是否能够以更低的成本为公司提供同等的劳动生产率,并为服务提供商提供可行的商业模式。我们的分析确定了一些问题,这些问题将对这种新模式的“工作”能力产生重大影响。根据经验,我们研究了主要作为联合办公设施的办公物业的近期销售价格,并将其与使用传统租赁的类似物业的销售价格进行了比较。采用新模式的建筑销售价格和上限率较低,表明投资者对我们发现的问题感到担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信