Benchmarking contact-less surface measurement devices for fingerprint acquisition in forensic investigations: Results for a differential scan approach with a chromatic white light sensor

M. Hildebrandt, R. Merkel, M. Leich, Stefan Kiltz, J. Dittmann, C. Vielhauer
{"title":"Benchmarking contact-less surface measurement devices for fingerprint acquisition in forensic investigations: Results for a differential scan approach with a chromatic white light sensor","authors":"M. Hildebrandt, R. Merkel, M. Leich, Stefan Kiltz, J. Dittmann, C. Vielhauer","doi":"10.1109/ICDSP.2011.6004969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of new contact-less sensors for forensic investigations of latent fingerprint traces, the authors see the need for a benchmarking framework to evaluate existing devices and promising combinations of data acquisition and signal processing techniques. This paper extends the existing benchmarking framework from [1] by categorizing it into properties from a forensic point-of-view (end-user) and a technical point-of-view (scientific-user) and applies a known differential image technique for the subjective evaluation of which traces are visible. We show exemplary results for a chromatic white light (CWL) sensor for the surface quality assessment, using and comparing the experimental setup of 10 surfaces from [1] and additional 10 surfaces, including real-world objects, to determine its potential for detecting latent fingerprints. Using a differential image approach, the particular influence of sensor noise signals is analyzed, showing that this differential approach cannot always be considered as an ideal filter for fingerprint pattern detection.","PeriodicalId":360702,"journal":{"name":"2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSP.2011.6004969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

With the advent of new contact-less sensors for forensic investigations of latent fingerprint traces, the authors see the need for a benchmarking framework to evaluate existing devices and promising combinations of data acquisition and signal processing techniques. This paper extends the existing benchmarking framework from [1] by categorizing it into properties from a forensic point-of-view (end-user) and a technical point-of-view (scientific-user) and applies a known differential image technique for the subjective evaluation of which traces are visible. We show exemplary results for a chromatic white light (CWL) sensor for the surface quality assessment, using and comparing the experimental setup of 10 surfaces from [1] and additional 10 surfaces, including real-world objects, to determine its potential for detecting latent fingerprints. Using a differential image approach, the particular influence of sensor noise signals is analyzed, showing that this differential approach cannot always be considered as an ideal filter for fingerprint pattern detection.
法医调查中指纹采集的非接触式表面测量设备的基准测试:彩色白光传感器差分扫描方法的结果
随着用于潜在指纹痕迹法医调查的新型非接触式传感器的出现,作者认为需要一个基准框架来评估现有设备和有前途的数据采集和信号处理技术组合。本文扩展了现有的基准框架[1],从法医的角度(最终用户)和技术的角度(科学用户)将其分类为属性,并应用已知的差分图像技术来主观评估哪些痕迹是可见的。我们展示了用于表面质量评估的彩色白光(CWL)传感器的示例性结果,使用并比较了来自[1]的10个表面和另外10个表面(包括现实世界的物体)的实验设置,以确定其检测潜在指纹的潜力。利用差分图像方法,分析了传感器噪声信号的特殊影响,表明这种差分方法并不总是被认为是指纹模式检测的理想滤波器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信