Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.

K. Tobias, Calvin E Kidd, P. Mulon, Xiaojuan Zhu
{"title":"Tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable monofilament suture materials before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline.","authors":"K. Tobias, Calvin E Kidd, P. Mulon, Xiaojuan Zhu","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo compare tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable, monofilament suture material before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nTwo sizes (2-0 and 3-0) of Biosyn, Maxon, Monocryl, PDS II, Securocryl, and Securodox were tested.\n\n\nSAMPLE POPULATION\nTen suture loops per group.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTensile strength, elongation, and modulus of suture loops were measured at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, or 28 days of incubation in PBS.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSize, suture material, and size × suture material interaction influenced maximum breaking load, maximum elongation, and modulus of elasticity. At baseline, 2-0 and 3-0 Maxon had the highest breaking loads (111.67 N and 79.71 N, respectively) for their size, and 2-0 PDSII and 3-0 Securodox had the lowest (68.71 N and 48.73 N, respectively). Maxon 2-0 and 3-0 had the greatest elongations (9.68 mm and 8.45 mm, respectively) for their size, and 2-0 Biosyn and 3-0 Securocryl had the least (7.21 mm and 6.58 mm, respectively). Biosyn 2-0 and 3-0 had the highest modulus. With incubation, Maxon (2-0), PDS II (2-0, 3-0), and Securodox (2-0, 3-0) maintained or gained strength over 4 weeks. Strengths of 2-0 and 3-0 Biosyn and 3-0 Maxon were maintained for 2 weeks, while Monocryl and Securocryl lost 20% to 44% of baseline strength within 1 week and 60% to 72% within 2 weeks. Day 7 strengths of 2-0 Biosyn and 2-0 Monocryl were greater than baseline strength of 2-0 PDS II. Strength of 3-0 Biosyn at day 14 was greater than strength of Monocryl at days 7 and 14 and greater than strength of 3-0 PDS II, 3-0 Securodox, and 3-0 Securocryl at baseline and days 7 and 14.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nSuture tensile properties varied with suture size, composition, and brand. At baseline, Maxon suture had the greatest strength and elongation, and Biosyn had the greatest stiffness.\n\n\nCLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE\nTensile strength retention, when reported as a percentage of original strength, provides insufficient information for comparison of suture tensile properties.","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":"356 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare tensile properties of synthetic, absorbable, monofilament suture material before and after incubation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). STUDY DESIGN Two sizes (2-0 and 3-0) of Biosyn, Maxon, Monocryl, PDS II, Securocryl, and Securodox were tested. SAMPLE POPULATION Ten suture loops per group. METHODS Tensile strength, elongation, and modulus of suture loops were measured at baseline and after 7, 14, 21, or 28 days of incubation in PBS. RESULTS Size, suture material, and size × suture material interaction influenced maximum breaking load, maximum elongation, and modulus of elasticity. At baseline, 2-0 and 3-0 Maxon had the highest breaking loads (111.67 N and 79.71 N, respectively) for their size, and 2-0 PDSII and 3-0 Securodox had the lowest (68.71 N and 48.73 N, respectively). Maxon 2-0 and 3-0 had the greatest elongations (9.68 mm and 8.45 mm, respectively) for their size, and 2-0 Biosyn and 3-0 Securocryl had the least (7.21 mm and 6.58 mm, respectively). Biosyn 2-0 and 3-0 had the highest modulus. With incubation, Maxon (2-0), PDS II (2-0, 3-0), and Securodox (2-0, 3-0) maintained or gained strength over 4 weeks. Strengths of 2-0 and 3-0 Biosyn and 3-0 Maxon were maintained for 2 weeks, while Monocryl and Securocryl lost 20% to 44% of baseline strength within 1 week and 60% to 72% within 2 weeks. Day 7 strengths of 2-0 Biosyn and 2-0 Monocryl were greater than baseline strength of 2-0 PDS II. Strength of 3-0 Biosyn at day 14 was greater than strength of Monocryl at days 7 and 14 and greater than strength of 3-0 PDS II, 3-0 Securodox, and 3-0 Securocryl at baseline and days 7 and 14. CONCLUSION Suture tensile properties varied with suture size, composition, and brand. At baseline, Maxon suture had the greatest strength and elongation, and Biosyn had the greatest stiffness. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Tensile strength retention, when reported as a percentage of original strength, provides insufficient information for comparison of suture tensile properties.
合成可吸收单丝缝合材料在磷酸盐缓冲盐水中孵育前后的拉伸性能。
目的比较合成可吸收单丝缝合材料在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中培养前后的拉伸性能。研究设计测试了Biosyn、Maxon、Monocryl、PDS II、Securocryl和Securodox两种规格(2-0和3-0)。每组10个缝合环。方法在基线和PBS孵育7、14、21、28天后测量缝线环的拉伸强度、伸长率和模量。结果缝线尺寸、缝线材料以及缝线尺寸与缝线材料的交互作用影响最大断裂载荷、最大伸长率和弹性模量。在基线时,2-0和3-0 Maxon的断裂负荷最高(分别为111.67 N和79.71 N), 2-0 PDSII和3-0 Securodox的断裂负荷最低(分别为68.71 N和48.73 N)。Maxon 2-0和3-0的伸长最大(分别为9.68 mm和8.45 mm), 2-0 Biosyn和3-0 Securocryl的伸长最小(分别为7.21 mm和6.58 mm)。biosyn2 -0和3-0的模量最高。经孵育,Maxon(2-0)、PDS II(2- 0,3 -0)和Securodox(2- 0,3 -0)在4周内保持或增强强度。2-0和3-0 Biosyn和3-0 Maxon的强度维持2周,而Monocryl和Securocryl的强度在1周内下降20%至44%,在2周内下降60%至72%。2-0 Biosyn和2-0 Monocryl的第7天强度大于2-0 PDS II的基线强度。3-0 Biosyn在第14天的强度大于Monocryl在第7天和第14天的强度,大于3-0 PDS II、3-0 Securodox和3-0 Securocryl在基线和第7天和第14天的强度。结论缝线的拉伸性能随缝线尺寸、成分和品牌的不同而不同。在基线时,Maxon缝合具有最大的强度和伸长率,而Biosyn缝合具有最大的刚度。当以原始强度的百分比报告拉伸强度保留时,为缝合拉伸性能的比较提供了不足的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信