evaluation of translucency and biaxial flexural strength of different ceramic materials.

taha alsharawi, hoda abdal sadek, T. Morsy
{"title":"evaluation of translucency and biaxial flexural strength of different ceramic materials.","authors":"taha alsharawi, hoda abdal sadek, T. Morsy","doi":"10.21608/ajdsm.2022.137532.1332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate Translucency and Flexural strength of four ceramic materials Lithium disilicate (Emax), translucent zirconia (Bruxizir), Ultra translucent zirconia (Katana ST) and Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity), using two thickness, 0.5 mm and 1mm. Materials and Methods: Blocks of four CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials (emax, suprinity, bruxzir and katana) were used to prepare 80 samples (disks) with the following dimensions: 10mm x 0.5mm and 10mm x 1mm for suprinity and emax ceramic material & 12mm x 0.6mm and 12mm x 1.2mm for Bruxzir and katana ceramic material. Using IsoMet 4000 micro saw by a diamond disk 0.6 mm thickness with cutting speed 2500 rpm. Then all the disks were crystallized and sintered. One Ceramic disc of each material were examined under a Reflective spectrophotometer (Model RM200QC, X-Rite, Neu-Isenburg, Germany) to determine the translucency for each disk. After that each disk was subjected to a biaxial flexural strength test. Results: For translucency test, at 0.5mm the highest value was found with Vita Suprinity (21.71±1.59), followed by Emax (17.89±3.47), then Bruxzir (13.27±1.86) while the lowest value was found with Katana ST (11.57±2.45). while at 1mm the highest value was found with Emax (14.78±1.63), followed by Vita Suprinity (14.65±1.58), then Katana ST (10.59±2.16) while the lowest value was found with Bruxzir (10.42±1.56). Otherwise for biaxial flexural strength, at 0.5 mm the highest value was found with bruxzir (194.04±59.50), followed by Katana ST (191.66±63.71), then suprinity (163.96±28.86), while the lowest value was found with Emax (113.70±26.76). while at 1mm the highest value was found with Katana ST (605.47±115.98), followed by Bruxzir (588.40±111.39), then Emax (474.62±68.36) while the lowest value was found with Vita Suprinity (419.50±76.96). Conclusion: Increasing thickness affect the flexural strength of ceramic material positively, while it affects the translucency negatively except for katana. Different ceramic material exhibited variable translucency and flexural strength values depending on their composition. Lithium disilicate materials show more translucency and lower flexural strength than zirconia materials.","PeriodicalId":117944,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Journal of Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajdsm.2022.137532.1332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate Translucency and Flexural strength of four ceramic materials Lithium disilicate (Emax), translucent zirconia (Bruxizir), Ultra translucent zirconia (Katana ST) and Zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (Suprinity), using two thickness, 0.5 mm and 1mm. Materials and Methods: Blocks of four CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials (emax, suprinity, bruxzir and katana) were used to prepare 80 samples (disks) with the following dimensions: 10mm x 0.5mm and 10mm x 1mm for suprinity and emax ceramic material & 12mm x 0.6mm and 12mm x 1.2mm for Bruxzir and katana ceramic material. Using IsoMet 4000 micro saw by a diamond disk 0.6 mm thickness with cutting speed 2500 rpm. Then all the disks were crystallized and sintered. One Ceramic disc of each material were examined under a Reflective spectrophotometer (Model RM200QC, X-Rite, Neu-Isenburg, Germany) to determine the translucency for each disk. After that each disk was subjected to a biaxial flexural strength test. Results: For translucency test, at 0.5mm the highest value was found with Vita Suprinity (21.71±1.59), followed by Emax (17.89±3.47), then Bruxzir (13.27±1.86) while the lowest value was found with Katana ST (11.57±2.45). while at 1mm the highest value was found with Emax (14.78±1.63), followed by Vita Suprinity (14.65±1.58), then Katana ST (10.59±2.16) while the lowest value was found with Bruxzir (10.42±1.56). Otherwise for biaxial flexural strength, at 0.5 mm the highest value was found with bruxzir (194.04±59.50), followed by Katana ST (191.66±63.71), then suprinity (163.96±28.86), while the lowest value was found with Emax (113.70±26.76). while at 1mm the highest value was found with Katana ST (605.47±115.98), followed by Bruxzir (588.40±111.39), then Emax (474.62±68.36) while the lowest value was found with Vita Suprinity (419.50±76.96). Conclusion: Increasing thickness affect the flexural strength of ceramic material positively, while it affects the translucency negatively except for katana. Different ceramic material exhibited variable translucency and flexural strength values depending on their composition. Lithium disilicate materials show more translucency and lower flexural strength than zirconia materials.
不同陶瓷材料的透光性和双轴抗折强度评价。
目的:评价二硅酸锂(Emax)、半透明氧化锆(Bruxizir)、超半透明氧化锆(Katana ST)和氧化锆增强硅酸锂(Suprinity)四种陶瓷材料的半透明性和抗弯强度,采用0.5 mm和1mm两种厚度。材料与方法:采用四种CAD/CAM美学修复材料(emax、supity、bruxzir和katana)砌块制备80个样品(盘),尺寸分别为:supax和emax陶瓷材料为10mm × 0.5mm和10mm × 1mm, bruxzir和katana陶瓷材料为12mm × 0.6mm和12mm × 1.2mm。采用IsoMet 4000微锯由0.6 mm厚度的金刚石盘切割,切割速度为2500转/分。然后对所有的圆盘进行结晶和烧结。在反射分光光度计(型号RM200QC, X-Rite, Neu-Isenburg, Germany)下检测每种材料的一个陶瓷圆盘,以确定每个圆盘的半透明性。然后对每个圆盘进行双轴抗折强度测试。结果:在0.5mm处,Vita Suprinity的透明度值最高(21.71±1.59),Emax次之(17.89±3.47),Bruxzir次之(13.27±1.86),Katana ST最低(11.57±2.45)。在1mm处,Emax最高(14.78±1.63),Vita suprity其次(14.65±1.58),Katana ST最低(10.59±2.16),Bruxzir最低(10.42±1.56)。在0.5 mm处,双轴抗折强度以bruxzir最高(194.04±59.50),其次为Katana ST(191.66±63.71),其次为最强(163.96±28.86),Emax最低(113.70±26.76)。在1mm处,Katana ST最高(605.47±115.98),Bruxzir其次(588.40±111.39),Emax最低(474.62±68.36),Vita suprity最低(419.50±76.96)。结论:厚度的增加对陶瓷材料的抗弯强度有积极影响,对除武士刀外的透光性有消极影响。不同的陶瓷材料的组成不同,其透光率和抗弯强度也不同。与氧化锆材料相比,二硅酸锂材料具有更高的透光性和更低的抗弯强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信