Response to Daniel Miller, “The Populist Fantasy: American Ethno-Nationalism and the Dysphoria of the Body Politic”

K. Rees
{"title":"Response to Daniel Miller, “The Populist Fantasy: American Ethno-Nationalism and the Dysphoria of the Body Politic”","authors":"K. Rees","doi":"10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This response to Daniel Miller’s theoretical-philosophical reflection on the nature of a democratic social body offers a critique anchored in an empirically grounded comparative framework. Incorporating various internationally recognized benchmarks of political freedoms and civil liberties into Miller’s already well-developed analytical framework, which draws substantially on queer theory, provides a potentially stronger normative foundation for the discussion.","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"65-66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/SOUNDINGS.102.2-3.0253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This response to Daniel Miller’s theoretical-philosophical reflection on the nature of a democratic social body offers a critique anchored in an empirically grounded comparative framework. Incorporating various internationally recognized benchmarks of political freedoms and civil liberties into Miller’s already well-developed analytical framework, which draws substantially on queer theory, provides a potentially stronger normative foundation for the discussion.
对丹尼尔·米勒《民粹主义的幻想:美国民族主义与政治体的焦虑》的回应
摘要:本文对丹尼尔·米勒关于民主社会主体本质的理论哲学反思的回应,提供了一种基于经验基础的比较框架的批判。将各种国际公认的政治自由和公民自由的基准纳入米勒已经发展完善的分析框架中,该框架主要借鉴了酷儿理论,为讨论提供了潜在的更强大的规范基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信