A Novel Method Against Hardware Trojans in Approximate Circuits

Yuqin Dou, Chongyan Gu, Chenghua Wang, Weiqiang Liu
{"title":"A Novel Method Against Hardware Trojans in Approximate Circuits","authors":"Yuqin Dou, Chongyan Gu, Chenghua Wang, Weiqiang Liu","doi":"10.1109/isqed57927.2023.10129367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximate computing is a promising computing paradigm that trades off power consumption and performance for error-tolerant applications. Approximate computing has been widely studied, such as for arithmetic circuits and accelerators. However, recent research has shown security vulnerabilities in approximate circuits. Hardware Trojans are one of the major threats to hardware circuits and have not been fully studied for approximate computing. Majority voting (MV) based on vendor diversities has been proposed as an effective technique to mask and/or detect hardware Trojans when assembling trusted chips with untrustworthy components. However, the randomness and diversity of inherent errors in approximate circuits can invalidate the MV technique. In this paper, for the first time, the authors present the challenges to approximate circuits when multiple vendors are considered to provide IPs for approximate circuits (IPac). Experiments demonstrate that the MV strategy is not applicable when trusted chips are assembled with IPacs. A comparison-based technique is proposed to thwart hardware Trojan attacks on approximate circuits. The experimental results show a high effectiveness of the proposed method to detect hardware Trojans in approximate circuits.","PeriodicalId":315053,"journal":{"name":"2023 24th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 24th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/isqed57927.2023.10129367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximate computing is a promising computing paradigm that trades off power consumption and performance for error-tolerant applications. Approximate computing has been widely studied, such as for arithmetic circuits and accelerators. However, recent research has shown security vulnerabilities in approximate circuits. Hardware Trojans are one of the major threats to hardware circuits and have not been fully studied for approximate computing. Majority voting (MV) based on vendor diversities has been proposed as an effective technique to mask and/or detect hardware Trojans when assembling trusted chips with untrustworthy components. However, the randomness and diversity of inherent errors in approximate circuits can invalidate the MV technique. In this paper, for the first time, the authors present the challenges to approximate circuits when multiple vendors are considered to provide IPs for approximate circuits (IPac). Experiments demonstrate that the MV strategy is not applicable when trusted chips are assembled with IPacs. A comparison-based technique is proposed to thwart hardware Trojan attacks on approximate circuits. The experimental results show a high effectiveness of the proposed method to detect hardware Trojans in approximate circuits.
近似电路中对抗硬件木马的新方法
近似计算是一种很有前途的计算范式,它为容错应用程序权衡了功耗和性能。近似计算已被广泛研究,例如用于算术电路和加速器。然而,最近的研究表明,近似电路存在安全漏洞。硬件木马是硬件电路的主要威胁之一,目前尚未对其进行充分的近似计算研究。基于供应商多样性的多数投票(MV)被认为是一种有效的技术,可以在将可信芯片与不可信组件组装在一起时屏蔽和/或检测硬件木马。然而,近似电路中固有误差的随机性和多样性会使中压技术失效。在本文中,作者首次提出了当考虑多个供应商为近似电路(IPac)提供ip时,近似电路面临的挑战。实验表明,当可信芯片与IPacs组合时,MV策略不适用。提出了一种基于比较的方法来阻止近似电路上的硬件木马攻击。实验结果表明,该方法在近似电路中检测硬件木马具有较高的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信