Criminal Responsibility for The Crime of Torture under Investigation According to The Federal Penal Code of The United Arab Emirates

Hajaj Naji Nasr Alhajjaji
{"title":"Criminal Responsibility for The Crime of Torture under Investigation According to The Federal Penal Code of The United Arab Emirates","authors":"Hajaj Naji Nasr Alhajjaji","doi":"10.46722/hkmh.5.2.22g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the civilized human and legal progress that humanity is witnessing, the acts of torture committed by public officials against the accused in order to get them to confess to the crimes they are suspected of committing are still continuing, and this is a clear violation of all international and national norms and laws that criminalize these acts, as this research aims To clarify the legal framework for the crime of torturing the accused to drive a confession in accordance with the Federal Penal Code of the United Arab Emirates, and to distinguish between this crime and other crimes with similar acts, by answering the following study questions: What is the concept of the crime of torture? And what are its pillars? And the components of this crime? How can this crime be distinguished from other similar crimes? , where the descriptive analytical method was followed in this study, and at the end of this study several results were reached, the most important of which are: the hypnosis, the lie detector, the prolonged interrogation, the interrogation under the influence of anesthesia (the truth drug), put pressure on the freedom of the accused to defend himself And that the legislator in the UAE has referred the result of the infringing intent represented in the death of the victim to the crime of manslaughter, based on the text of the first paragraph of Article No. 387 of the Federal Penal Code.","PeriodicalId":160994,"journal":{"name":"Al Hikmah International Journal of Islamic Studies and Human Sciences","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Hikmah International Journal of Islamic Studies and Human Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46722/hkmh.5.2.22g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the civilized human and legal progress that humanity is witnessing, the acts of torture committed by public officials against the accused in order to get them to confess to the crimes they are suspected of committing are still continuing, and this is a clear violation of all international and national norms and laws that criminalize these acts, as this research aims To clarify the legal framework for the crime of torturing the accused to drive a confession in accordance with the Federal Penal Code of the United Arab Emirates, and to distinguish between this crime and other crimes with similar acts, by answering the following study questions: What is the concept of the crime of torture? And what are its pillars? And the components of this crime? How can this crime be distinguished from other similar crimes? , where the descriptive analytical method was followed in this study, and at the end of this study several results were reached, the most important of which are: the hypnosis, the lie detector, the prolonged interrogation, the interrogation under the influence of anesthesia (the truth drug), put pressure on the freedom of the accused to defend himself And that the legislator in the UAE has referred the result of the infringing intent represented in the death of the victim to the crime of manslaughter, based on the text of the first paragraph of Article No. 387 of the Federal Penal Code.
根据《阿拉伯联合酋长国联邦刑法典》调查的酷刑罪的刑事责任
尽管人类正在见证文明的人类和法律的进步,但公职人员为了使被告承认他们涉嫌犯下的罪行而对他们实施酷刑的行为仍在继续,这显然违反了将这些行为定为犯罪的所有国际和国家准则和法律。因为本研究旨在根据《阿拉伯联合酋长国联邦刑法典》澄清酷刑罪的法律框架,并通过回答以下研究问题来区分这种罪行和其他具有类似行为的罪行:酷刑罪的概念是什么?它的支柱是什么?犯罪的组成部分是什么?如何将这种罪行与其他类似罪行区分开来?,本研究采用了描述性分析方法,在本研究的最后得出了几个结果,其中最重要的是:催眠、测谎仪、长时间审讯、麻醉(致真相药)作用下的审讯,对被告自我辩护的自由造成了压力,阿联酋的立法者根据《联邦刑法典》第387条第1款的规定,将受害人死亡所代表的侵权意图的结果定为过失杀人罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书