A scoping study and qualitative assessment of care planning and case management in community paramedicine

M. Leyenaar, B. McLeod, Joyce Chan, W. Tavares, Andrew P. Costa, G. Agarwal
{"title":"A scoping study and qualitative assessment of care planning and case management in community paramedicine","authors":"M. Leyenaar, B. McLeod, Joyce Chan, W. Tavares, Andrew P. Costa, G. Agarwal","doi":"10.32378/IJP.V3I1.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:  Community paramedicine (CP) establishes an ongoing patient relationship beyond short emergency care episodes. How care planning and case management have been adapted from the isolated incidents of traditional practice is unclear.  The objective of this study is to contribute to paramedic practice by examining broad areas of care planning in CP, identifying gaps in the evidence, clarifying key concepts, and reporting on the types of evidence that address and inform practice.  A qualitative analysis of included literature outlines program capacities and identifies comprehensive models of care that can inform clinical practice in CP. Methods:  A scoping study was completed that included conducting a systematic search of the literature (in MEDLINE and CINAHL) and selecting relevant studies, followed by data extraction, summarizing, and reporting.  The authors of included studies were contacted to confirm the aspects of care planning that were extracted from their respective studies.  Aspects of care planning were compared between studies and used to generate a comprehensive list of existing practices. Results:   Ten of 1648 studies met inclusion criteria.  Qualitative analysis identified 22 aspects of care planning along four themes; enrollment (n=3), assessment and management (n=6), intervention and care (n=5), and collaboration (n=8).  No study included all 22 aspects of care planning.  One aspect of care planning was present in all 10 studies; collaboration with primary care providers. Conclusion:  The aspects of care planning identified through this study provide a framework that can guide service providers in the delivery of care and researchers in defined outcome measures to be assessed.  Future program development should be guided by the finding that all articles included in this study included collaboration with primary care providers.  By summarizing care planning within CP programs, ongoing program development can embrace collaboration with other care providers to help insure that patients receive the appropriate care.","PeriodicalId":367364,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"617 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32378/IJP.V3I1.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Introduction:  Community paramedicine (CP) establishes an ongoing patient relationship beyond short emergency care episodes. How care planning and case management have been adapted from the isolated incidents of traditional practice is unclear.  The objective of this study is to contribute to paramedic practice by examining broad areas of care planning in CP, identifying gaps in the evidence, clarifying key concepts, and reporting on the types of evidence that address and inform practice.  A qualitative analysis of included literature outlines program capacities and identifies comprehensive models of care that can inform clinical practice in CP. Methods:  A scoping study was completed that included conducting a systematic search of the literature (in MEDLINE and CINAHL) and selecting relevant studies, followed by data extraction, summarizing, and reporting.  The authors of included studies were contacted to confirm the aspects of care planning that were extracted from their respective studies.  Aspects of care planning were compared between studies and used to generate a comprehensive list of existing practices. Results:   Ten of 1648 studies met inclusion criteria.  Qualitative analysis identified 22 aspects of care planning along four themes; enrollment (n=3), assessment and management (n=6), intervention and care (n=5), and collaboration (n=8).  No study included all 22 aspects of care planning.  One aspect of care planning was present in all 10 studies; collaboration with primary care providers. Conclusion:  The aspects of care planning identified through this study provide a framework that can guide service providers in the delivery of care and researchers in defined outcome measures to be assessed.  Future program development should be guided by the finding that all articles included in this study included collaboration with primary care providers.  By summarizing care planning within CP programs, ongoing program development can embrace collaboration with other care providers to help insure that patients receive the appropriate care.
社区护理医学中护理计划和病例管理的范围研究和定性评估
简介:社区辅助医学(CP)建立了一种持续的病人关系,超越了短期的紧急护理事件。护理计划和病例管理如何从传统实践的孤立事件中进行调整尚不清楚。本研究的目的是通过检查CP中护理计划的广泛领域,确定证据中的差距,澄清关键概念,并报告解决和告知实践的证据类型,从而为护理人员实践做出贡献。对纳入的文献进行定性分析,概述了项目能力,并确定了可以为CP临床实践提供信息的综合护理模式。方法:完成了一项范围界定研究,包括对文献(MEDLINE和CINAHL)进行系统检索,选择相关研究,然后进行数据提取、总结和报告。与纳入研究的作者联系,以确认从各自研究中提取的护理计划方面。护理计划的各个方面在研究之间进行比较,并用于生成现有实践的综合列表。结果:1648项研究中有10项符合纳入标准。定性分析确定了护理计划的22个方面,涉及四个主题;入组(n=3)、评估与管理(n=6)、干预与护理(n=5)、协作(n=8)。没有研究包括所有22个方面的护理计划。护理计划的一个方面在所有10项研究中都存在;与初级保健提供者合作。结论:通过本研究确定的护理计划方面提供了一个框架,可以指导服务提供者提供护理和研究人员确定要评估的结果措施。未来的项目开发应以本研究中所有文章都包括与初级保健提供者的合作这一发现为指导。通过总结CP项目中的护理计划,正在进行的项目开发可以与其他护理提供者合作,以帮助确保患者得到适当的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信