Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Dialogue Management

F. Hengst, M. Hoogendoorn, F. V. Harmelen, Joost Bosman
{"title":"Reinforcement Learning for Personalized Dialogue Management","authors":"F. Hengst, M. Hoogendoorn, F. V. Harmelen, Joost Bosman","doi":"10.1145/3350546.3352501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Language systems have been of great interest to the research community and have recently reached the mass market through various assistant platforms on the web. Reinforcement Learning methods that optimize dialogue policies have seen successes in past years and have recently been extended into methods that personalizethe dialogue, e.g. take the personal context of users into account. These works, however, are limited to personalization to a single user with whom they require multiple interactions and do not generalize the usage of context across users. This work introduces a problem where a generalized usage of context is relevant and proposes two Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based approaches to this problem. The first approach uses a single learner and extends the traditional POMDP formulation of dialogue state with features that describe the user context. The second approach segments users by context and then employs a learner per context. We compare these approaches in a benchmark of existing non-RL and RL-based methods in three established and one novel application domain of financial product recommendation. We compare the influence of context and training experiences on performance and find that learning approaches generally outperform a handcrafted gold standard. CCS CONCEPTS • Computing methodologies → Reinforcement learning; Discourse, dialogue and pragmatics; • Human-centered computing → Natural language interfaces.","PeriodicalId":171168,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3350546.3352501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Language systems have been of great interest to the research community and have recently reached the mass market through various assistant platforms on the web. Reinforcement Learning methods that optimize dialogue policies have seen successes in past years and have recently been extended into methods that personalizethe dialogue, e.g. take the personal context of users into account. These works, however, are limited to personalization to a single user with whom they require multiple interactions and do not generalize the usage of context across users. This work introduces a problem where a generalized usage of context is relevant and proposes two Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based approaches to this problem. The first approach uses a single learner and extends the traditional POMDP formulation of dialogue state with features that describe the user context. The second approach segments users by context and then employs a learner per context. We compare these approaches in a benchmark of existing non-RL and RL-based methods in three established and one novel application domain of financial product recommendation. We compare the influence of context and training experiences on performance and find that learning approaches generally outperform a handcrafted gold standard. CCS CONCEPTS • Computing methodologies → Reinforcement learning; Discourse, dialogue and pragmatics; • Human-centered computing → Natural language interfaces.
个性化对话管理的强化学习
语言系统已经引起了研究界的极大兴趣,并且最近通过网络上的各种辅助平台进入了大众市场。优化对话策略的强化学习方法在过去几年中取得了成功,最近被扩展到个性化对话的方法,例如考虑用户的个人背景。然而,这些工作仅限于对单个用户的个性化,他们需要与单个用户进行多次交互,并且不会在用户之间推广上下文的使用。这项工作引入了一个与上下文的广义使用相关的问题,并提出了两种基于强化学习(RL)的方法来解决这个问题。第一种方法使用单个学习器,并使用描述用户上下文的特征扩展对话状态的传统POMDP公式。第二种方法是根据上下文对用户进行细分,然后根据上下文使用学习器。我们在三个已建立的和一个新的金融产品推荐应用领域中,以现有的非rl和基于rl的方法为基准,比较了这些方法。我们比较了环境和训练经验对表现的影响,发现学习方法通常优于手工制作的黄金标准。•计算方法→强化学习;语篇、对话与语用学;•以人为中心的计算→自然语言界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信