Understanding the (lack of) utilization of work-family practices: a multilevel perspective

Yin Lee, Amit Kramer
{"title":"Understanding the (lack of) utilization of work-family practices: a multilevel perspective","authors":"Yin Lee, Amit Kramer","doi":"10.1108/ccsm-05-2021-0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeMany employees do not use work-family practices to their full extent, even when they are in need of them. Drawing on the concept of psychological safety the authors propose a new construct: psychological accessibility– employees' sense of embracing the benefits of work-family practices without experiencing a fear of using them. The authors argue that the psychological accessibility of work-family practices could explain the variations in the utilization of work-family practices among employees with similar levels of family needs. Furthermore, the authors propose multilevel contextual factors that could affect the psychological accessibility of work-family practices.Design/methodology/approachThe authors develop a theoretical multilevel framework for work-family practices that places psychological accessibility at its core and addresses accessibility of work-family practices from a macro level that includes institutions and the different attributes of the national culture, a meso level that includes work time norms in organizations, and a micro level, that includes the social context at the team level in organizations.FindingsAs part of the conceptual development the authors offer 10 propositions.Originality/valueThe authors' multilevel model of psychological accessibility could explain the variations in the utilization of work-family practices across different national, organizational and group contexts. This paper refocuses scholarly attention to the psychological antecedents of the utilization of work-family practices. The authors offer some practical recommendations to make the utilization of work-family practices a psychologically safe activity.","PeriodicalId":373772,"journal":{"name":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccsm-05-2021-0081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeMany employees do not use work-family practices to their full extent, even when they are in need of them. Drawing on the concept of psychological safety the authors propose a new construct: psychological accessibility– employees' sense of embracing the benefits of work-family practices without experiencing a fear of using them. The authors argue that the psychological accessibility of work-family practices could explain the variations in the utilization of work-family practices among employees with similar levels of family needs. Furthermore, the authors propose multilevel contextual factors that could affect the psychological accessibility of work-family practices.Design/methodology/approachThe authors develop a theoretical multilevel framework for work-family practices that places psychological accessibility at its core and addresses accessibility of work-family practices from a macro level that includes institutions and the different attributes of the national culture, a meso level that includes work time norms in organizations, and a micro level, that includes the social context at the team level in organizations.FindingsAs part of the conceptual development the authors offer 10 propositions.Originality/valueThe authors' multilevel model of psychological accessibility could explain the variations in the utilization of work-family practices across different national, organizational and group contexts. This paper refocuses scholarly attention to the psychological antecedents of the utilization of work-family practices. The authors offer some practical recommendations to make the utilization of work-family practices a psychologically safe activity.
理解(缺乏)工作-家庭实践的利用:一个多层次的视角
许多员工没有充分利用工作家庭实践,即使当他们需要的时候。根据心理安全的概念,作者提出了一个新的概念:心理可及性——员工接受工作家庭实践的好处而不害怕使用它们的感觉。作者认为,工作家庭实践的心理可达性可以解释具有相似家庭需求水平的员工对工作家庭实践的利用差异。此外,作者还提出了影响工作家庭实践心理可及性的多层次情境因素。设计/方法论/方法作者为工作-家庭实践开发了一个理论多层框架,将心理可及性置于其核心,并从宏观层面(包括制度和民族文化的不同属性)、中观层面(包括组织中的工作时间规范)和微观层面(包括组织中的社会背景)来解决工作-家庭实践的可及性问题。作为概念发展的一部分,作者提出了10个命题。作者的多层次心理可及性模型可以解释不同国家、组织和群体背景下工作家庭实践利用的差异。本文将学术注意力重新集中到工作-家庭实践运用的心理前因。作者提出了一些实用的建议,使工作-家庭实践的利用成为一种心理安全的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信