{"title":"Speech in Action: Victorian Philology and the Uprooting of Language","authors":"Philipp Erchinger","doi":"10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474438957.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is concerned with the use of language, the common medium through which both literary and scientific texts come into the social world. Charting key points of contest in the Victorian debate about the origin and evolution of human speech, the chapter focuses on the contributions of F. Max Müller and Edward B. Tylor in particular. It argues that, in Müller’s work, the very attempt to demonstrate that there is a quasi-divine reason at the “root” of each word makes his writing develop a poetical logic that tends to outgrow the theoretical foundation it is supposed to be built upon. In this way, Müller’s lectures intimate, even though they do not say it, that the logic of language inheres in the multiple ways in which it is used, rather than dwelling in a place or “root” outside of them. As a result, Müller’s work not only enacts its own theory about the creative power of metaphor; it also aligns itself, unwittingly, with the philosophy of Edward B. Tylor whose attempts to reconcile the ideal meaning of words with the material practice of gesturing and drawing seem otherwise to deviate sharply from Müller’s approach.","PeriodicalId":244672,"journal":{"name":"Artful Experiments","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artful Experiments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/EDINBURGH/9781474438957.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter is concerned with the use of language, the common medium through which both literary and scientific texts come into the social world. Charting key points of contest in the Victorian debate about the origin and evolution of human speech, the chapter focuses on the contributions of F. Max Müller and Edward B. Tylor in particular. It argues that, in Müller’s work, the very attempt to demonstrate that there is a quasi-divine reason at the “root” of each word makes his writing develop a poetical logic that tends to outgrow the theoretical foundation it is supposed to be built upon. In this way, Müller’s lectures intimate, even though they do not say it, that the logic of language inheres in the multiple ways in which it is used, rather than dwelling in a place or “root” outside of them. As a result, Müller’s work not only enacts its own theory about the creative power of metaphor; it also aligns itself, unwittingly, with the philosophy of Edward B. Tylor whose attempts to reconcile the ideal meaning of words with the material practice of gesturing and drawing seem otherwise to deviate sharply from Müller’s approach.
这一章关注的是语言的使用,这是文学和科学文本进入社会世界的共同媒介。在维多利亚时代关于人类语言的起源和进化的辩论中,本章主要关注F. Max m勒和爱德华B.泰勒的贡献。它认为,在米勒的作品中,正是试图证明在每个词的“根源”中都有一个准神圣的原因,使得他的作品发展出一种诗意的逻辑,这种逻辑往往超出了它应该建立在的理论基础之上。通过这种方式,尽管她没有说出来,但她的演讲表明,语言的逻辑存在于它被使用的多种方式中,而不是居住在它们之外的一个地方或“根”。因此,勒的作品不仅制定了自己关于隐喻创造力的理论;它还在不知不觉中与爱德华·b·泰勒(Edward B. tyler)的哲学保持一致,后者试图将词语的理想意义与手势和绘画的物质实践相协调,否则,这似乎与米勒的方法大相径庭。