Evaluation of combined effects in dose-response wstudies by statistical comparison with additive and independent interactions

Gerald Pöch, Peter Dittrich, Sigrid Holzmann
{"title":"Evaluation of combined effects in dose-response wstudies by statistical comparison with additive and independent interactions","authors":"Gerald Pöch,&nbsp;Peter Dittrich,&nbsp;Sigrid Holzmann","doi":"10.1016/0160-5402(90)90015-D","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An improved method for the evaluation of combined drug effects by means of dose-response curves (DRCs) is described. A drug, A, was tested in the absence and presence of a fixed concentration of another drug, B, mainly in organ-bath experiments with smooth muscle strips from bovine coronary arteries and trachéal muscle. The results of such experiments are expressed in terms of percent of maximum response. Median values, rather than mean values, for each concentration of drug A were determined in order to allow a comparison of observed with expected frequencies above or below median DRCs of additive and independent interactions. This comparison was done with the chi-square goodnessof-fit statistic. Advantage was taken of the curve-fitting program ALLFIT to construct DRCs. However, the method presented does not require a computer program. The results indicate that additive interactions point to actions of drugs at the same site inasmuch as they differ significantly from independent interactions. Overadditive interactions reflect differences between the sites of action. This may either be due to independent actions or to some kind of synergistic “cooperativity”, for example, sequential interaction. The effects of the latter significantly exceed the effects expected for independently interacting compounds. This method appears applicable to compounds exerting all kinds of responses that can be described by DRCs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological methods","volume":"24 4","pages":"Pages 311-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-5402(90)90015-D","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016054029090015D","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

An improved method for the evaluation of combined drug effects by means of dose-response curves (DRCs) is described. A drug, A, was tested in the absence and presence of a fixed concentration of another drug, B, mainly in organ-bath experiments with smooth muscle strips from bovine coronary arteries and trachéal muscle. The results of such experiments are expressed in terms of percent of maximum response. Median values, rather than mean values, for each concentration of drug A were determined in order to allow a comparison of observed with expected frequencies above or below median DRCs of additive and independent interactions. This comparison was done with the chi-square goodnessof-fit statistic. Advantage was taken of the curve-fitting program ALLFIT to construct DRCs. However, the method presented does not require a computer program. The results indicate that additive interactions point to actions of drugs at the same site inasmuch as they differ significantly from independent interactions. Overadditive interactions reflect differences between the sites of action. This may either be due to independent actions or to some kind of synergistic “cooperativity”, for example, sequential interaction. The effects of the latter significantly exceed the effects expected for independently interacting compounds. This method appears applicable to compounds exerting all kinds of responses that can be described by DRCs.

通过加性和独立相互作用的统计比较评价剂量-反应研究中的联合效应
本文描述了一种改进的剂量-反应曲线(DRCs)评价联合药物效应的方法。一种药物A在另一种药物B没有和有固定浓度的情况下进行了测试,主要是在用牛冠状动脉和气管肌的平滑肌条进行器官浴实验。这种实验的结果是用最大响应的百分比来表示的。确定每个药物A浓度的中位数,而不是平均值,以便将观察到的频率与预期频率进行比较,这些频率高于或低于加性和独立相互作用的中位数dc。这个比较是用卡方拟合优度统计量完成的。利用曲线拟合程序ALLFIT的优势来构建drc。然而,所提出的方法不需要计算机程序。结果表明,加性相互作用指向药物在同一位点的作用,因为它们与独立相互作用有显著差异。超加性相互作用反映了作用位点之间的差异。这可能是由于独立行动或某种协同“合作”,例如,顺序互动。后者的效果明显超过了独立相互作用的化合物的预期效果。这种方法似乎适用于产生各种可以用DRCs描述的反应的化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信