ICDAR2017 Competition on Recognition of Documents with Complex Layouts - RDCL2017

C. Clausner, A. Antonacopoulos, S. Pletschacher
{"title":"ICDAR2017 Competition on Recognition of Documents with Complex Layouts - RDCL2017","authors":"C. Clausner, A. Antonacopoulos, S. Pletschacher","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2017.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an objective comparative evaluation of page segmentation and region classification methods for documents with complex layouts. It describes the competition (modus operandi, dataset and evaluation methodology) held in the context of ICDAR2017, presenting the results of the evaluation of seven methods – five submitted, two state-of-the-art systems (commercial and open-source). Three scenarios are reported in this paper, one evaluating the ability of methods to accurately segment regions and two evaluating both segmentation and region classification (one focusing only on text regions). For the first time, nested region content (table cells, chart labels etc.) are evaluated in addition to the top-level page content. Text recognition was a bonus challenge and was not taken up by all participants. The results indicate that an innovative approach has a clear advantage but there is still a considerable need to develop robust methods that deal with layout challenges, especially with the non-textual content.","PeriodicalId":433676,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

Abstract

This paper presents an objective comparative evaluation of page segmentation and region classification methods for documents with complex layouts. It describes the competition (modus operandi, dataset and evaluation methodology) held in the context of ICDAR2017, presenting the results of the evaluation of seven methods – five submitted, two state-of-the-art systems (commercial and open-source). Three scenarios are reported in this paper, one evaluating the ability of methods to accurately segment regions and two evaluating both segmentation and region classification (one focusing only on text regions). For the first time, nested region content (table cells, chart labels etc.) are evaluated in addition to the top-level page content. Text recognition was a bonus challenge and was not taken up by all participants. The results indicate that an innovative approach has a clear advantage but there is still a considerable need to develop robust methods that deal with layout challenges, especially with the non-textual content.
ICDAR2017复杂布局文档识别竞赛- RDCL2017
本文对复杂布局文档的页面分割和区域分类方法进行了客观的比较评价。它描述了在ICDAR2017背景下举行的竞赛(操作方式、数据集和评估方法),展示了七种方法的评估结果——五种提交方法,两种最先进的系统(商业和开源)。本文报道了三种场景,一种是评估方法准确分割区域的能力,另一种是评估分割和区域分类的能力(一种只关注文本区域)。除了顶层页面内容外,还首次评估嵌套区域内容(表格单元格、图表标签等)。文本识别是一个额外的挑战,并不是所有的参与者都参加。结果表明,创新的方法具有明显的优势,但仍然需要开发强大的方法来处理布局挑战,特别是对于非文本内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信