Addressing gendered affordances of the platform economy: the case of UpWork

Elisabetta Stringhi
{"title":"Addressing gendered affordances of the platform economy: the case of UpWork","authors":"Elisabetta Stringhi","doi":"10.14763/2022.1.1634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This study investigates UpWork affordances and their implications for female freelancers experiencing different forms of cyberviolence. Building up on a theoretical framework to situate the concept of affordances, gendered affordances and cyberviolence within a platform economy context, I use UpWork as a relevant case study to assess how online platforms that intermediate labour transactions present gendered affordances contributing to cyberviolence against women. I analysed the discussions of female users and freelancers in UpWork in line with the digital methods approach, by conducting a qualitative digital ethnographic analysis. These discussions serve as a foundation for a subsequent critical analysis of UpWork terms of service, to gain a wider understanding of how the digital platform controls information flows and models interactions between different categories of users. The findings suggest that UpWork affordances are gendered affordances, as they allow male users different conducts, as opposed to female freelancers, entrepreneurs, or users. I conclude that, while UpWork core features are allegedly neutral, they enable gendered affordances widening the gender gap in digital market transactions by facilitating the occurrence of cyber violence against women.","PeriodicalId":219999,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Rev.","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2022.1.1634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

: This study investigates UpWork affordances and their implications for female freelancers experiencing different forms of cyberviolence. Building up on a theoretical framework to situate the concept of affordances, gendered affordances and cyberviolence within a platform economy context, I use UpWork as a relevant case study to assess how online platforms that intermediate labour transactions present gendered affordances contributing to cyberviolence against women. I analysed the discussions of female users and freelancers in UpWork in line with the digital methods approach, by conducting a qualitative digital ethnographic analysis. These discussions serve as a foundation for a subsequent critical analysis of UpWork terms of service, to gain a wider understanding of how the digital platform controls information flows and models interactions between different categories of users. The findings suggest that UpWork affordances are gendered affordances, as they allow male users different conducts, as opposed to female freelancers, entrepreneurs, or users. I conclude that, while UpWork core features are allegedly neutral, they enable gendered affordances widening the gender gap in digital market transactions by facilitating the occurrence of cyber violence against women.
解决平台经济的性别负担:UpWork的案例
本研究调查了UpWork的支持及其对经历不同形式网络暴力的女性自由职业者的影响。在一个理论框架的基础上,在平台经济背景下,我使用UpWork作为一个相关的案例研究,来评估中间劳动力交易的在线平台如何呈现性别支持,从而导致针对女性的网络暴力。我根据数字方法分析了UpWork中女性用户和自由职业者的讨论,通过进行定性的数字人种学分析。这些讨论为后续对UpWork服务条款的批判性分析奠定了基础,从而更广泛地了解数字平台如何控制信息流和不同类别用户之间的交互模型。研究结果表明,UpWork支持性别支持,因为它允许男性用户进行不同的行为,而不是女性自由职业者、企业家或用户。我的结论是,虽然UpWork的核心功能据称是中性的,但它们通过促进针对女性的网络暴力的发生,使性别支持扩大了数字市场交易中的性别差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信