An empirical evaluation of a testing and debugging methodology for Excel

Jeffrey C. Carver, M. Fisher, G. Rothermel
{"title":"An empirical evaluation of a testing and debugging methodology for Excel","authors":"Jeffrey C. Carver, M. Fisher, G. Rothermel","doi":"10.1145/1159733.1159775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spreadsheets are one of the most commonly used types of programs in the world, and it is important that they be sufficiently dependable. To help end users who create spreadsheets do so more reliably, we have created a testing and debugging methodology and environment for use in spreadsheets, known as the WYSIWYT methodology. Our prior experiments with WYSIWYT show that users can utilize it to ensure that their spreadsheets are more dependable, but these experiments to date have considered only an unfamiliar prototype spreadsheet environment, and have not involved spreadsheet creation tasks. In this work we conducted a controlled experiment that addresses these limitations. The results of this study indicate that the use of WYSIWYT did not affect the correctness of spreadsheets created by users, but it did significantly reduce the amount of effort required to create them. Further, the subjects' evaluation of the help provided by WYSIWYT was very positive. Our results provide several insights into the use of the WYSIWYT methodology by end users.","PeriodicalId":201305,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1159733.1159775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Spreadsheets are one of the most commonly used types of programs in the world, and it is important that they be sufficiently dependable. To help end users who create spreadsheets do so more reliably, we have created a testing and debugging methodology and environment for use in spreadsheets, known as the WYSIWYT methodology. Our prior experiments with WYSIWYT show that users can utilize it to ensure that their spreadsheets are more dependable, but these experiments to date have considered only an unfamiliar prototype spreadsheet environment, and have not involved spreadsheet creation tasks. In this work we conducted a controlled experiment that addresses these limitations. The results of this study indicate that the use of WYSIWYT did not affect the correctness of spreadsheets created by users, but it did significantly reduce the amount of effort required to create them. Further, the subjects' evaluation of the help provided by WYSIWYT was very positive. Our results provide several insights into the use of the WYSIWYT methodology by end users.
一个实证评估的测试和调试方法的Excel
电子表格是世界上最常用的程序类型之一,重要的是它们足够可靠。为了帮助创建电子表格的最终用户更可靠地这样做,我们创建了一个用于电子表格的测试和调试方法和环境,称为所见即所得方法。我们之前对所见即所的实验表明,用户可以利用它来确保他们的电子表格更加可靠,但是到目前为止,这些实验只考虑了一个不熟悉的原型电子表格环境,并且没有涉及电子表格创建任务。在这项工作中,我们进行了一个对照实验来解决这些限制。本研究的结果表明,使用所见即所得并不影响用户创建的电子表格的正确性,但它确实显著减少了创建电子表格所需的工作量。此外,被试对WYSIWYT提供的帮助的评价是非常积极的。我们的结果为最终用户使用所见即所得方法提供了一些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信