A Survey on Modeling Techniques for Formal Behavioral Verification of Software Product Lines

Fabian Benduhn, Thomas Thüm, Malte Lochau, Thomas Leich, G. Saake
{"title":"A Survey on Modeling Techniques for Formal Behavioral Verification of Software Product Lines","authors":"Fabian Benduhn, Thomas Thüm, Malte Lochau, Thomas Leich, G. Saake","doi":"10.1145/2701319.2701332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As software product lines are increasingly used for safety-critical systems, researchers have adapted formal verification techniques such as model checking and theorem proving to cope with compiletime variability. While the focus of the ongoing debate lies on the verification mechanisms itself, it becomes increasingly difficult for researchers to maintain an overview about the various accompanying modeling techniques. We survey existing approaches as a first step towards a unifying view on variability mechanisms in formal modeling techniques for product lines. We illustrate the approaches by means of a running example to illustrate their commonalities and differences.","PeriodicalId":232045,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive Systems","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2701319.2701332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

As software product lines are increasingly used for safety-critical systems, researchers have adapted formal verification techniques such as model checking and theorem proving to cope with compiletime variability. While the focus of the ongoing debate lies on the verification mechanisms itself, it becomes increasingly difficult for researchers to maintain an overview about the various accompanying modeling techniques. We survey existing approaches as a first step towards a unifying view on variability mechanisms in formal modeling techniques for product lines. We illustrate the approaches by means of a running example to illustrate their commonalities and differences.
软件产品线形式化行为验证建模技术综述
随着软件产品线越来越多地用于安全关键系统,研究人员已经采用了正式的验证技术,如模型检查和定理证明,以应对编译时的可变性。虽然正在进行的辩论的焦点在于验证机制本身,但对于研究人员来说,对各种伴随的建模技术进行概述变得越来越困难。我们调查了现有的方法,作为对产品线正式建模技术中可变性机制的统一视图的第一步。我们通过一个运行的例子来说明这些方法的共同点和不同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信