Cartel or Non-Cartel: Problems of Proving Agreements Between Competitors After the Adoption of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of March 4, 2021 No. 2

M. A. Buzin
{"title":"Cartel or Non-Cartel: Problems of Proving Agreements Between Competitors After the Adoption of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of March 4, 2021 No. 2","authors":"M. A. Buzin","doi":"10.47361/2542-0259-2022-spv-70-76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the practice of proving cartel agreements after the adoption of the Resolution No. 2 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 4th, 2021 “On some issues arising in connection with the application of antimonopoly legislation by the courts.”Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, the legal approaches of the law enforcement officer to the establishment and proof of signs of cartel agreements prohibited in accordance with Article 11 of the Federal Law of July 26th, 2006 No. 135-FZ “On Protection of Competition”, with all their effectiveness, were often criticized by the professional community for lower standards of proof and lack of attention to the economic aspects of the violations investigated.Based on the latest trends in law enforcement practice in cartel cases, the author comes to the conclusion that the clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, reflected in the Resolution No. 2 of its Plenum dated March 4, 2021, contribute to the formation of a more grounded approach to the interpretation and proving of cartels.","PeriodicalId":250547,"journal":{"name":"Russian competition law and economy","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian competition law and economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47361/2542-0259-2022-spv-70-76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the practice of proving cartel agreements after the adoption of the Resolution No. 2 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 4th, 2021 “On some issues arising in connection with the application of antimonopoly legislation by the courts.”Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, the legal approaches of the law enforcement officer to the establishment and proof of signs of cartel agreements prohibited in accordance with Article 11 of the Federal Law of July 26th, 2006 No. 135-FZ “On Protection of Competition”, with all their effectiveness, were often criticized by the professional community for lower standards of proof and lack of attention to the economic aspects of the violations investigated.Based on the latest trends in law enforcement practice in cartel cases, the author comes to the conclusion that the clarifications of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, reflected in the Resolution No. 2 of its Plenum dated March 4, 2021, contribute to the formation of a more grounded approach to the interpretation and proving of cartels.
《卡特尔或非卡特尔:在俄罗斯联邦最高法院2021年3月4日全体会议通过后证明竞争者之间协议的问题》
本文致力于分析俄罗斯联邦最高法院全体会议于2021年3月4日通过的第2号决议“关于法院适用反垄断法所产生的一些问题”之后证明卡特尔协议的实践。在本决议通过之前,执法人员根据2006年7月26日第135-FZ号“关于保护竞争”的联邦法第11条禁止建立和证明卡特尔协议迹象的法律方法,其有效性经常受到专业人士的批评,因为证据标准较低,缺乏对所调查违规行为的经济方面的关注。根据卡特尔案件执法实践的最新趋势,作者得出结论,俄罗斯联邦最高法院在其2021年3月4日全体会议第2号决议中作出的澄清有助于形成一种更有根据的卡特尔解释和证明方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信