Comparison of the Effects of Individualized Postpartum Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation at Different Time Points in the Early Postpartum Period

T. Dong
{"title":"Comparison of the Effects of Individualized Postpartum Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation at Different Time Points in the Early Postpartum Period","authors":"T. Dong","doi":"10.26689/aogr.v1i1.5008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the clinical value of applying individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation at different time points in the early postpartum period. Methods: 184 patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from February 2021 to December 2022 were included in the study. Upon admission, they were divided into two groups, a conventional group (n = 46) and an intervention group (n = 138), by the random number table method. The patients in the conventional group underwent postpartum routine rehabilitation, while those in the intervention group underwent individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation. The patients in the intervention group were further divided into intervention group 1 (6–8 weeks), intervention group 2 (8–10 weeks), and intervention group 3 (10–13 weeks) according to the time of care. The rehabilitation effects were compared between the groups. Results: The pelvic floor muscle function of the patients in the intervention group was more ideal compared with those in the conventional group, and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower among patients in the intervention group; the comparison of the above indicators was statistically significant (P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the relevant indicators among intervention group 1, group 2, and group 3 (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Although our study showed no significant difference in the effects of individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation at different time points in the early postpartum period, individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation in the early postpartum period has definite clinical value, as it improves pelvic floor muscle function and reduces the incidence of adverse reactions.","PeriodicalId":269611,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26689/aogr.v1i1.5008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the clinical value of applying individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation at different time points in the early postpartum period. Methods: 184 patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University from February 2021 to December 2022 were included in the study. Upon admission, they were divided into two groups, a conventional group (n = 46) and an intervention group (n = 138), by the random number table method. The patients in the conventional group underwent postpartum routine rehabilitation, while those in the intervention group underwent individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation. The patients in the intervention group were further divided into intervention group 1 (6–8 weeks), intervention group 2 (8–10 weeks), and intervention group 3 (10–13 weeks) according to the time of care. The rehabilitation effects were compared between the groups. Results: The pelvic floor muscle function of the patients in the intervention group was more ideal compared with those in the conventional group, and the incidence of adverse reactions was lower among patients in the intervention group; the comparison of the above indicators was statistically significant (P < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference in the relevant indicators among intervention group 1, group 2, and group 3 (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Although our study showed no significant difference in the effects of individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation at different time points in the early postpartum period, individualized postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation in the early postpartum period has definite clinical value, as it improves pelvic floor muscle function and reduces the incidence of adverse reactions.
产后早期不同时间点个体化产后盆底康复效果比较
目的:探讨产后早期不同时间点应用个性化产后盆底康复的临床价值。方法:选取2021年2月至2022年12月江苏大学附属医院收治的184例患者作为研究对象。入院时采用随机数字表法将患者分为常规组(n = 46)和干预组(n = 138)。常规组采用产后常规康复治疗,干预组采用个体化产后盆底康复治疗。根据护理时间将干预组患者进一步分为干预组1(6-8周)、干预组2(8-10周)、干预组3(10-13周)。比较两组患者的康复效果。结果:干预组患者盆底肌功能较常规组更理想,不良反应发生率较常规组低;以上指标比较均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预组1、干预组2、干预组3间相关指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:虽然我们的研究显示,产后早期不同时间点的产后盆底个体化康复效果无显著差异,但产后早期的产后盆底个体化康复改善了盆底肌肉功能,减少了不良反应的发生,具有一定的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信