Using ROC curves and AUC to evaluate performance of no-reference image fusion metrics

M. Ferris, Michel McLaughlin, Samuel Grieggs, Soundararajan Ezekiel, Erik Blasch, M. Alford, Maria Cornacchia, A. Bubalo
{"title":"Using ROC curves and AUC to evaluate performance of no-reference image fusion metrics","authors":"M. Ferris, Michel McLaughlin, Samuel Grieggs, Soundararajan Ezekiel, Erik Blasch, M. Alford, Maria Cornacchia, A. Bubalo","doi":"10.1109/NAECON.2015.7443034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image fusion has many applications in which a reference image is not always available including image registration, medical imaging, and fusion between visible and infrared imagery. For these no-reference applications, it is important that there are objective and efficient methods for validating fusion performance, as subjective image fusion evaluation is time consuming and non-scalable. There have been multiple no-reference objective metrics created in the past. These include mutual information, spatial frequency, and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). However, it is important to consider justification of a given evaluation metric as appropriate for a given type of image fusion method. We seek to ensure that if a given metric scores one image higher than another, then the image with the higher metric score is subjectively preferred. This pilot study investigates the applications of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) as a method of validation for fusion metrics used for evaluating image fusion methods. The results from the pilot study indicate that ROC curves and AUC provide a discriminating form of validation for image fusion metrics to support image fusion applications evaluation.","PeriodicalId":133804,"journal":{"name":"2015 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.2015.7443034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Image fusion has many applications in which a reference image is not always available including image registration, medical imaging, and fusion between visible and infrared imagery. For these no-reference applications, it is important that there are objective and efficient methods for validating fusion performance, as subjective image fusion evaluation is time consuming and non-scalable. There have been multiple no-reference objective metrics created in the past. These include mutual information, spatial frequency, and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). However, it is important to consider justification of a given evaluation metric as appropriate for a given type of image fusion method. We seek to ensure that if a given metric scores one image higher than another, then the image with the higher metric score is subjectively preferred. This pilot study investigates the applications of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) as a method of validation for fusion metrics used for evaluating image fusion methods. The results from the pilot study indicate that ROC curves and AUC provide a discriminating form of validation for image fusion metrics to support image fusion applications evaluation.
采用ROC曲线和AUC评价无参考图像融合指标的性能
图像融合有许多应用,其中参考图像并不总是可用的,包括图像配准、医学成像以及可见光和红外图像之间的融合。对于这些无参考的应用,重要的是有客观有效的方法来验证融合性能,因为主观的图像融合评估耗时且不可扩展。过去已经创建了多个无参考的客观指标。这些包括互信息、空间频率和结构相似性指数测量(SSIM)。然而,对于给定类型的图像融合方法,考虑给定评估度量的合理性是很重要的。我们力求确保,如果给定的指标评分一个图像高于另一个图像,那么具有较高指标评分的图像在主观上是首选的。本试点研究探讨了接收者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)作为用于评估图像融合方法的融合指标验证方法的应用。试点研究的结果表明,ROC曲线和AUC为图像融合指标提供了一种判别性的验证形式,以支持图像融合应用评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信