Understanding the Association of Personal Outlook in Free Speech Regulation and the Risk of being Mis/Disinformed

Kevin Matthe Caramancion
{"title":"Understanding the Association of Personal Outlook in Free Speech Regulation and the Risk of being Mis/Disinformed","authors":"Kevin Matthe Caramancion","doi":"10.1109/AIIoT52608.2021.9454212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the relationship between a person's outlook on the issues of freedom of speech (IV1), fake news regulation (IV2), and the risk of him/her falling prey to Mis/Disinformation attacks (DV). Participants (n=162) were explicitly asked to choose a position among these issues and were subjected to the Fake News and deepfake test (15-item). The main data analysis tool employed for this study is factorial, two-way ANOVA. Important findings of the study include the revelation of the disparity in the performance of the subjects who are leaning to the government for information regulation against those who prefer the tech companies, among others. The intended target audience of this paper are policymakers and legal professionals possibly seeking for judicial references.","PeriodicalId":443405,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIIoT52608.2021.9454212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between a person's outlook on the issues of freedom of speech (IV1), fake news regulation (IV2), and the risk of him/her falling prey to Mis/Disinformation attacks (DV). Participants (n=162) were explicitly asked to choose a position among these issues and were subjected to the Fake News and deepfake test (15-item). The main data analysis tool employed for this study is factorial, two-way ANOVA. Important findings of the study include the revelation of the disparity in the performance of the subjects who are leaning to the government for information regulation against those who prefer the tech companies, among others. The intended target audience of this paper are policymakers and legal professionals possibly seeking for judicial references.
了解言论自由监管中个人观点与被误导风险的关系
本文探讨了一个人对言论自由(IV1)、假新闻监管(IV2)问题的看法与他/她成为Mis/Disinformation攻击(DV)牺牲品的风险之间的关系。参与者(n=162)被明确要求在这些问题中选择一个立场,并接受假新闻和深度假测试(15个问题)。本研究采用的主要数据分析工具为因子、双向方差分析。该研究的重要发现包括揭示了倾向于政府进行信息监管的受试者与倾向于科技公司等的受试者在表现上的差异。本文的目标受众是可能寻求司法参考的政策制定者和法律专业人士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信