Feature and Classifier Selection for Automatic Classification of Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast

Y. Gal, A. Mehnert, A. Bradley, D. Kennedy, S. Crozier
{"title":"Feature and Classifier Selection for Automatic Classification of Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of the Breast","authors":"Y. Gal, A. Mehnert, A. Bradley, D. Kennedy, S. Crozier","doi":"10.1109/DICTA.2009.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The clinical interpretation of breast MRI remains largely subjective, and the reported findings qualitative. Although the sensitivity of the method for detecting breast cancer is high, its specificity is poor. Computerised interpretation offers the possibility of improving specificity through objective quantitative measurement. This paper reviews the plethora of such features that have been proposed and presents a preliminary study of the most discriminatory features for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. In particular the results of a feature/classifier selection experiment are presented based on 20 lesions (10 malignant and 10 benign) from 20 routine clinical breast MRI examinations. Each lesion was segmented manually by a clinical radiographer and its diagnostic status confirmed by cytopathology or histopathology. The results show that textural and kinetic, rather than morphometric, features are the most important for lesion classification. They also show that the SVM classifier with sigmoid kernel performs better than other well-known classifiers: Fisher's linear discriminant function, Bayes linear classifier, logistic regression, and SVM with other kernels (distance, exponential, and radial).","PeriodicalId":277395,"journal":{"name":"2009 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2009.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

The clinical interpretation of breast MRI remains largely subjective, and the reported findings qualitative. Although the sensitivity of the method for detecting breast cancer is high, its specificity is poor. Computerised interpretation offers the possibility of improving specificity through objective quantitative measurement. This paper reviews the plethora of such features that have been proposed and presents a preliminary study of the most discriminatory features for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. In particular the results of a feature/classifier selection experiment are presented based on 20 lesions (10 malignant and 10 benign) from 20 routine clinical breast MRI examinations. Each lesion was segmented manually by a clinical radiographer and its diagnostic status confirmed by cytopathology or histopathology. The results show that textural and kinetic, rather than morphometric, features are the most important for lesion classification. They also show that the SVM classifier with sigmoid kernel performs better than other well-known classifiers: Fisher's linear discriminant function, Bayes linear classifier, logistic regression, and SVM with other kernels (distance, exponential, and radial).
乳腺动态增强MRI病灶自动分类的特征与分类器选择
乳房MRI的临床解释在很大程度上仍然是主观的,而报道的结果是定性的。虽然该方法检测乳腺癌的灵敏度较高,但特异性较差。通过客观的定量测量,计算机解释提供了提高特异性的可能性。本文回顾了已经提出的过多的这样的特征,并提出了乳房动态对比增强MRI最具歧视性的特征的初步研究。特别是基于20例常规临床乳腺MRI检查的20个病变(10个恶性和10个良性)的特征/分类器选择实验的结果。每个病变由临床放射技师手工分割,并通过细胞病理学或组织病理学证实其诊断状态。结果表明,纹理和动力学特征,而不是形态特征,是最重要的病变分类。他们还表明,具有sigmoid核的SVM分类器比其他知名的分类器性能更好:Fisher的线性判别函数、Bayes线性分类器、逻辑回归和具有其他核(距离、指数和径向)的SVM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信