{"title":"The Passing of Raymond E. Brown","authors":"D. Bossman","doi":"10.1177/014610799902800401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The news of Raymond E. Brown’s death on August 8, 1998 arrived during the annual meeting of the Catholic Biblical Association at which Roland E. Murphy coincidentally yet most appropriately delivered the address, &dquo;What Is Catholic about Catholic Biblical Scholarship?&dquo; (BTB 28:3, 112-19). Both Brown and Murphy are former presidents of this association. Both produce scholarship clearly Catholic in character and modem in substance. Both respect and follow guidelines of the Pontifical Biblical Commission (BTB 26:2, 79-81). For both, caution was never so strict that they forsook honesty. Together, they span the two Testaments. Orthodoxy for Raymond E. Brown was a hallmark. Given a conflict between text and theology, he found a middle course that allowed both to survive. His lines of argument may have exhausted the field; yet his Catholic loyalty never flagged. Still, Brown ob-","PeriodicalId":227137,"journal":{"name":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biblical Theology Bulletin: A Journal of Bible and Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/014610799902800401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The news of Raymond E. Brown’s death on August 8, 1998 arrived during the annual meeting of the Catholic Biblical Association at which Roland E. Murphy coincidentally yet most appropriately delivered the address, &dquo;What Is Catholic about Catholic Biblical Scholarship?&dquo; (BTB 28:3, 112-19). Both Brown and Murphy are former presidents of this association. Both produce scholarship clearly Catholic in character and modem in substance. Both respect and follow guidelines of the Pontifical Biblical Commission (BTB 26:2, 79-81). For both, caution was never so strict that they forsook honesty. Together, they span the two Testaments. Orthodoxy for Raymond E. Brown was a hallmark. Given a conflict between text and theology, he found a middle course that allowed both to survive. His lines of argument may have exhausted the field; yet his Catholic loyalty never flagged. Still, Brown ob-
雷蒙德·布朗于1998年8月8日去世的消息传来时,正值天主教圣经协会的年会上,罗兰·墨菲(Roland E. Murphy)巧合而又恰如其分地发表了题为《天主教圣经研究的天主教意义何在?》(伯28:3,112-19)。布朗和墨菲都是这个协会的前任主席。两者都产生了明确的天主教性质和现代实质的学术。两者都尊重并遵循宗座圣经委员会的指导方针(BTB 26:2, 79-81)。对他们两人来说,谨慎从来没有严格到放弃诚实的程度。它们合在一起,跨越了两个《新约》。雷蒙德·e·布朗(Raymond E. Brown)信奉正统是一个标志。考虑到文本和神学之间的冲突,他找到了一条中间道路,使两者都能生存下去。他的论点可能已经耗尽了这个领域;但他对天主教的忠诚从未减弱不过,布朗