Time and Size - The Hidden Dimensions of Corporate Governance

P. Mihályi
{"title":"Time and Size - The Hidden Dimensions of Corporate Governance","authors":"P. Mihályi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1804168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent literature on corporate governance (CG), the dominant view is that the underlying problem is simple. Managers of Enron in the US or Parmalat in Italy were simply unethical, corrupt or both. They all knew what should have been the right behavior. The rules of CG were good, but the bad guys transgressed them. By cheating, they deliberately betrayed the interest of outside shareholders. The conclusion: more stringent enforcement rules and more vigilance will solve all the problems.This paper offers a different conclusion. First, it will be argued that in the context of modern corporations, the distinction between insiders and outsiders is much more complicated than usually thought. Second, we will show that there is no such thing as “good” CG rules. It is simply not true that adherence to modified CG rules, can guarantee good business. The second message of this paper is that size matters more than good CG. In the globalized world of business, size is the real guarantee of success. Preaching CG to the post-communist economies and promising that their companies can also grow into size at par with GE or IBM is grossly misleading. The third message is that the assumption, according to which stock prices reflect fundamentals and thus in the absence of CG ‘noise’ they must display stability, does not hold water. It is a mistake to promise that good CG will help to attenuate macroeconomic fluctuations: the volatility of asset markets is an intrinsic feature of the capitalist system. Booms and busts, including bubbles, will stay with us in the near future.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1804168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the recent literature on corporate governance (CG), the dominant view is that the underlying problem is simple. Managers of Enron in the US or Parmalat in Italy were simply unethical, corrupt or both. They all knew what should have been the right behavior. The rules of CG were good, but the bad guys transgressed them. By cheating, they deliberately betrayed the interest of outside shareholders. The conclusion: more stringent enforcement rules and more vigilance will solve all the problems.This paper offers a different conclusion. First, it will be argued that in the context of modern corporations, the distinction between insiders and outsiders is much more complicated than usually thought. Second, we will show that there is no such thing as “good” CG rules. It is simply not true that adherence to modified CG rules, can guarantee good business. The second message of this paper is that size matters more than good CG. In the globalized world of business, size is the real guarantee of success. Preaching CG to the post-communist economies and promising that their companies can also grow into size at par with GE or IBM is grossly misleading. The third message is that the assumption, according to which stock prices reflect fundamentals and thus in the absence of CG ‘noise’ they must display stability, does not hold water. It is a mistake to promise that good CG will help to attenuate macroeconomic fluctuations: the volatility of asset markets is an intrinsic feature of the capitalist system. Booms and busts, including bubbles, will stay with us in the near future.
时间与规模——公司治理的隐性维度
在最近关于公司治理(CG)的文献中,占主导地位的观点是,潜在问题很简单。美国安然(Enron)或意大利帕玛拉特(Parmalat)的管理者要么不道德,要么腐败,或者两者兼而有之。他们都知道什么才是正确的行为。CG的规则是好的,但是坏人会违反规则。通过欺骗,他们故意背叛了外部股东的利益。结论:更严格的执法规则和更高的警惕性将解决所有问题。本文给出了一个不同的结论。首先,有人会说,在现代公司的背景下,内部人员和外部人员之间的区别比通常认为的要复杂得多。其次,我们将证明没有所谓的“好的”CG规则。坚持修改后的CG规则并不能保证良好的业务。本文的第二个信息是,尺寸比优秀的CG更重要。在全球化的商业世界里,规模是成功的真正保证。向后共产主义经济体鼓吹CG,并承诺它们的公司也能发展到与通用电气或IBM相当的规模,这是严重的误导。第三个信息是,假设股价反映基本面,因此在没有CG“噪音”的情况下,它们必须表现出稳定性,这种假设是站不住脚的。承诺良好的CG将有助于减轻宏观经济波动是错误的:资产市场的波动性是资本主义体系的内在特征。繁荣与萧条,包括泡沫,将在不久的将来伴随着我们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信