Child Support and the Custodial Mother's Move or Remarriage

I. M. Ellman, S. Braver
{"title":"Child Support and the Custodial Mother's Move or Remarriage","authors":"I. M. Ellman, S. Braver","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2470336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When a custodial mother marries a new partner, the income of the custodial household rises. The stepfather may earn much more than the father, or much less. He may or may not assume the social role of father, but his day to day contact and interaction with the child will often be more than the father’s. If the mother and stepfather move together with the child to a location distant from the father, he may be more likely to replace him in the child’s life. Whatever a stepfather’s legal obligations of support, economic realities ensure that his income will have an impact on the child’s financial well-being, and possibly a major impact. Yet the usual understanding is the law excludes the income of the mother’s new husband from consideration in setting the father’s child support obligation. Nor does it consider the impact of the remarriage, or any move, on the ability of the father to maintain a paternal relationship with the child. While these categorical exclusions are found in nearly every state’s formal rules, there are nonetheless examples of departures from them, some longstanding, that exist in particular circumstances, when the economic and social realities have overridden them. The increasing tension between the traditional rules and modern economic and social realities seems likely to present occasions to consider the rules’ reform. This paper asks whether the traditional rules are in fact consistent with the beliefs of citizens as to what the law should provide. It does so by presenting a random sample of several hundred citizens with a set of cases in which they are asked to decide the appropriate level of child support. We then infer their preferred rules by considering how their answers vary with changes in the custodial mother’s circumstances. Results in the cases are supplemented with Likert questions probing citizen views on statements of principle. The results show considerable support for taking remarriage into account in setting child support obligations, especially when the stepfather’s income is higher. While the mother’s relocation to a location distant from the father does not alone affect the support judgments of most respondents, the same move has a significant impact on respondents’ judgments when it is combined with either remarriage or an increase in the mother’s income. These effects are seen in both male and female respondents, although females are less responsive than males to remarriage without relocation. Our respondents appear to take both social and financial factors into account in these judgments, and overall prefer rules that are more nuanced than the categorical rules found in traditional child support law.","PeriodicalId":109057,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Child Custody (Topic)","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Child Custody (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2470336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When a custodial mother marries a new partner, the income of the custodial household rises. The stepfather may earn much more than the father, or much less. He may or may not assume the social role of father, but his day to day contact and interaction with the child will often be more than the father’s. If the mother and stepfather move together with the child to a location distant from the father, he may be more likely to replace him in the child’s life. Whatever a stepfather’s legal obligations of support, economic realities ensure that his income will have an impact on the child’s financial well-being, and possibly a major impact. Yet the usual understanding is the law excludes the income of the mother’s new husband from consideration in setting the father’s child support obligation. Nor does it consider the impact of the remarriage, or any move, on the ability of the father to maintain a paternal relationship with the child. While these categorical exclusions are found in nearly every state’s formal rules, there are nonetheless examples of departures from them, some longstanding, that exist in particular circumstances, when the economic and social realities have overridden them. The increasing tension between the traditional rules and modern economic and social realities seems likely to present occasions to consider the rules’ reform. This paper asks whether the traditional rules are in fact consistent with the beliefs of citizens as to what the law should provide. It does so by presenting a random sample of several hundred citizens with a set of cases in which they are asked to decide the appropriate level of child support. We then infer their preferred rules by considering how their answers vary with changes in the custodial mother’s circumstances. Results in the cases are supplemented with Likert questions probing citizen views on statements of principle. The results show considerable support for taking remarriage into account in setting child support obligations, especially when the stepfather’s income is higher. While the mother’s relocation to a location distant from the father does not alone affect the support judgments of most respondents, the same move has a significant impact on respondents’ judgments when it is combined with either remarriage or an increase in the mother’s income. These effects are seen in both male and female respondents, although females are less responsive than males to remarriage without relocation. Our respondents appear to take both social and financial factors into account in these judgments, and overall prefer rules that are more nuanced than the categorical rules found in traditional child support law.
子女抚养费和监护母亲的搬迁或再婚
当监护母亲与新伴侣结婚时,监护家庭的收入就会增加。继父可能比父亲挣得多,也可能挣得少。他可能会也可能不会承担父亲的社会角色,但他与孩子的日常接触和互动往往会比父亲更多。如果母亲和继父带着孩子一起搬到远离父亲的地方,父亲更有可能在孩子的生活中取代父亲。无论继父的法律义务是什么,经济现实都确保他的收入会对孩子的经济状况产生影响,而且可能是重大影响。然而,通常的理解是,在确定父亲的子女抚养义务时,法律将母亲的新丈夫的收入排除在外。它也没有考虑到再婚或任何搬家对父亲维持与孩子父爱关系的能力的影响。尽管几乎每个州的正式法规中都有这些明确的排除条款,但也有偏离这些条款的例子,其中一些是长期存在的,存在于经济和社会现实压倒这些条款的特定情况下。传统规则与现代经济和社会现实之间日益紧张的关系似乎可能提供考虑规则改革的机会。本文探讨了传统规则是否与公民关于法律应提供什么的信念实际上是一致的。为此,它随机抽取了几百名公民作为样本,向他们提供了一系列案例,要求他们决定适当的子女抚养费水平。然后,我们通过考虑他们的回答如何随着监护母亲环境的变化而变化,推断出他们偏好的规则。案例的结果还补充了李克特问题,探讨公民对原则陈述的看法。结果显示,在制定子女抚养义务时,尤其是在继父收入较高的情况下,相当多的人支持将再婚考虑在内。虽然母亲搬到远离父亲的地方并不会单独影响大多数受访者的抚养判断,但同样的举动,如果与再婚或母亲收入增加相结合,则会对受访者的判断产生重大影响。这些影响在男性和女性受访者中都可以看到,尽管女性对没有搬迁的再婚的反应不如男性。我们的受访者似乎在这些判决中考虑了社会和经济因素,总体而言,他们更喜欢比传统儿童抚养法中明确规定更微妙的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信