Legislative Initiative for Work-Family Reconciliation in South Korea: A Comparative Analysis of the South Korean, American, French, and German Family Leave Policies

Myunghwa Lee
{"title":"Legislative Initiative for Work-Family Reconciliation in South Korea: A Comparative Analysis of the South Korean, American, French, and German Family Leave Policies","authors":"Myunghwa Lee","doi":"10.15779/Z38DP2K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thesis compares the family leave policies (mat ernity, paternity and parental leave) of South Korea, U.S., France, and G ermany by exploring the cultural context and purposes in adopting famil y leave laws. Unlike Western nations, family leave legislation has been ineffective in South Korea since family leave laws were adopted as a mea ns to achieve the ranks of a developed nation, with little considerat ion as to internal cultural values. Traditional influences of Confucia nism, which support gender inequality have hindered implementation of f amily leave laws, which are based on democratic principles. One metho d o embrace family leave in Korea is through recognition of a collecti ve goal of increasing women’s workforce participation through family leav , since collectivism has historically been accepted and valued by the Ko rean people. By shifting responsibility for children from parents t o government, children can be regarded as public goods, and the establishm ent of public childcare centers can support the implementation of family leave policies to assist working families in South Korea.","PeriodicalId":334951,"journal":{"name":"Asian American Law Journal","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian American Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38DP2K","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This thesis compares the family leave policies (mat ernity, paternity and parental leave) of South Korea, U.S., France, and G ermany by exploring the cultural context and purposes in adopting famil y leave laws. Unlike Western nations, family leave legislation has been ineffective in South Korea since family leave laws were adopted as a mea ns to achieve the ranks of a developed nation, with little considerat ion as to internal cultural values. Traditional influences of Confucia nism, which support gender inequality have hindered implementation of f amily leave laws, which are based on democratic principles. One metho d o embrace family leave in Korea is through recognition of a collecti ve goal of increasing women’s workforce participation through family leav , since collectivism has historically been accepted and valued by the Ko rean people. By shifting responsibility for children from parents t o government, children can be regarded as public goods, and the establishm ent of public childcare centers can support the implementation of family leave policies to assist working families in South Korea.
韩国工作家庭和解的立法倡议:韩国、美国、法国和德国家庭休假政策的比较分析
本文通过对韩国、美国、法国和德国的家庭休假政策(陪产假、陪产假和育儿假)的比较,探讨了韩国、美国、法国和德国采用家庭休假法的文化背景和目的。与西方国家不同,韩国的家庭休假立法一直无效,因为家庭休假法是作为达到发达国家行列的手段而采用的,很少考虑内部文化价值。支持性别不平等的儒家思想的传统影响阻碍了以民主原则为基础的家庭休假法的实施。在韩国,接受家庭假的一种方法是通过承认通过家庭假增加女性劳动力参与的集体目标,因为集体主义历来被韩国人所接受和重视。通过将对孩子的责任从父母转移到政府,孩子可以被视为公共物品,建立公共托儿中心可以支持家庭休假政策的实施,以帮助韩国的工薪家庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信