Evaluation of the Effect of an In-Service Training Program on Assessment for Learning for English Language Teachers

Manolya Tunçer, A. Merç
{"title":"Evaluation of the Effect of an In-Service Training Program on Assessment for Learning for English Language Teachers","authors":"Manolya Tunçer, A. Merç","doi":"10.18039/ajesi.1219007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to present the effect of an In-Service Training (INSET) Program designed to develop Assessment for Learning (AfL) practices on English language teachers. For this purpose, English language teachers working in the state high schools attended the five-session-long INSET program in 2020-2021 Spring semester. Whether there were any changes between teachers’ responses to the tasks assigned before and after the sessions and what their opinions were related to the training were examined. Data collection tools included a task prepared for each session and a questionnaire including four-point Likert type questions and open-ended items. Descriptive statistics were used in the analysis of the quantitative data while deductive coding was employed to analyze the qualitative data. The results demonstrated that most of the teachers thought that AfL was ‘quite important’. The findings also yielded that the first three items about what changes were detected most were identified as ‘providing more opportunities to express their opinions’, ‘clarifying learning intentions in a detailed way’, and ‘using clear comments’. The outcomes shed light on the participant teachers’ ideas about the differentiations between their first and second responses to the same tasks, and most teachers reported variations between pre- and post-task responses as ‘partially changed’ or ‘changed a lot’. The techniques mentioned during the training were rated as ‘practical’ or ‘partial practical’ by a great number of teachers. The findings suggested that English language teachers should be given more chances for taking part in in-service training programs, especially on AfL; in this way, it can be provided that they can use the new strategies in English language classes efficiently.","PeriodicalId":134454,"journal":{"name":"Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.1219007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present the effect of an In-Service Training (INSET) Program designed to develop Assessment for Learning (AfL) practices on English language teachers. For this purpose, English language teachers working in the state high schools attended the five-session-long INSET program in 2020-2021 Spring semester. Whether there were any changes between teachers’ responses to the tasks assigned before and after the sessions and what their opinions were related to the training were examined. Data collection tools included a task prepared for each session and a questionnaire including four-point Likert type questions and open-ended items. Descriptive statistics were used in the analysis of the quantitative data while deductive coding was employed to analyze the qualitative data. The results demonstrated that most of the teachers thought that AfL was ‘quite important’. The findings also yielded that the first three items about what changes were detected most were identified as ‘providing more opportunities to express their opinions’, ‘clarifying learning intentions in a detailed way’, and ‘using clear comments’. The outcomes shed light on the participant teachers’ ideas about the differentiations between their first and second responses to the same tasks, and most teachers reported variations between pre- and post-task responses as ‘partially changed’ or ‘changed a lot’. The techniques mentioned during the training were rated as ‘practical’ or ‘partial practical’ by a great number of teachers. The findings suggested that English language teachers should be given more chances for taking part in in-service training programs, especially on AfL; in this way, it can be provided that they can use the new strategies in English language classes efficiently.
在职培训项目对英语教师学习评价的效果评价
本文的目的是展示旨在发展英语教师学习评估(AfL)实践的在职培训(INSET)计划的效果。为此,在州立高中工作的英语教师在2020-2021年春季学期参加了为期五学期的INSET项目。考察了教师在培训前后对任务的反应以及对培训的看法是否有变化。数据收集工具包括为每次会议准备的任务和一份问卷,其中包括李克特式的四点问题和开放式项目。定量数据采用描述性统计分析,定性数据采用演绎编码分析。结果表明,大多数教师认为AfL“相当重要”。调查结果还显示,最容易发现的前三项变化是“提供更多表达意见的机会”、“以详细的方式阐明学习意图”和“使用清晰的评论”。结果揭示了参与教师对相同任务的第一次和第二次反应之间差异的看法,大多数教师报告任务前后反应之间的差异是“部分改变”或“改变很大”。培训中提到的技巧被许多教师评为“实用”或“部分实用”。研究结果表明,应给予英语教师更多的机会参加在职培训项目,特别是在AfL方面;从而为学生在英语课堂中有效地运用新策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信