On classifier performance for remote sensing images compressed by different coders

G. Proskura, O. Rubel, S. Kryvenko, V. Lukin
{"title":"On classifier performance for remote sensing images compressed by different coders","authors":"G. Proskura, O. Rubel, S. Kryvenko, V. Lukin","doi":"10.32620/aktt.2023.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote sensing data are widely used in numerous applications. A conventional task solved using remote sensing images is their classification. The classification maps are commonly produced by some pre-trained classifiers applied either to uncompressed or compressed images where lossy compression is often needed and employed in practice due to the necessity to reduce data volume at stages of image transfer and storage. Then, the classification accuracy depends on the characteristics of an image, a classifier, and a coder used. The main subject of this paper is the factors that determine classification accuracy. One of them is compressed image quality. We fix the quality of compressed image quality characterized by the peak signal-to-noise ratio for several coders and rely on the same training approach. Our goal is twofold. First, we would like to consider classification accuracy for two approaches to classifier training: based on undistorted data and images with simulated distortions. Second, our desire is to compare the performance of different techniques of image compression. The task of this paper is to obtain an idea is it worth training the neural network classifier for uncompressed images or images of similar quality to the quality of compressed data to be classified. The coder’s influence on classification results is of special interest as well. The main results are the following. First, the classification accuracy is almost the same for classifiers trained for uncompressed and simulated compressed data for the general distortion model. Second, there is a certain difference in the classification results for different compression techniques studied. Lightly better classification results are observed for data produced by more sophisticated (modern) coders. Experiments have been carried out for two real-life three-channel Sentinel-2 images of Kharkiv and the Kharkiv region having different complexity. Four typical classes have been considered. As a conclusion, it is possible to state that either the general model of distortions must be modified or the classifier training should be performed for data produced by the corresponding compression technique.","PeriodicalId":418062,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace technic and technology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace technic and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32620/aktt.2023.1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote sensing data are widely used in numerous applications. A conventional task solved using remote sensing images is their classification. The classification maps are commonly produced by some pre-trained classifiers applied either to uncompressed or compressed images where lossy compression is often needed and employed in practice due to the necessity to reduce data volume at stages of image transfer and storage. Then, the classification accuracy depends on the characteristics of an image, a classifier, and a coder used. The main subject of this paper is the factors that determine classification accuracy. One of them is compressed image quality. We fix the quality of compressed image quality characterized by the peak signal-to-noise ratio for several coders and rely on the same training approach. Our goal is twofold. First, we would like to consider classification accuracy for two approaches to classifier training: based on undistorted data and images with simulated distortions. Second, our desire is to compare the performance of different techniques of image compression. The task of this paper is to obtain an idea is it worth training the neural network classifier for uncompressed images or images of similar quality to the quality of compressed data to be classified. The coder’s influence on classification results is of special interest as well. The main results are the following. First, the classification accuracy is almost the same for classifiers trained for uncompressed and simulated compressed data for the general distortion model. Second, there is a certain difference in the classification results for different compression techniques studied. Lightly better classification results are observed for data produced by more sophisticated (modern) coders. Experiments have been carried out for two real-life three-channel Sentinel-2 images of Kharkiv and the Kharkiv region having different complexity. Four typical classes have been considered. As a conclusion, it is possible to state that either the general model of distortions must be modified or the classifier training should be performed for data produced by the corresponding compression technique.
不同编码器压缩遥感图像分类器性能研究
遥感数据被广泛应用于许多领域。利用遥感图像解决的一个传统任务是它们的分类。分类图通常由一些预训练的分类器生成,这些分类器应用于未压缩或压缩的图像,由于在图像传输和存储阶段需要减少数据量,因此经常需要有损压缩并在实践中使用。然后,分类精度取决于图像、分类器和所用编码器的特征。本文主要研究了影响分类精度的因素。其中之一是压缩图像质量。我们固定了以峰值信噪比为特征的压缩图像质量,并依赖于相同的训练方法。我们的目标是双重的。首先,我们想考虑两种分类器训练方法的分类精度:基于未失真的数据和基于模拟失真的图像。其次,我们希望比较不同的图像压缩技术的性能。本文的任务是得到一个想法,即对于未压缩图像或与压缩数据质量相似的图像进行分类是否值得训练神经网络分类器。编码器对分类结果的影响也是我们特别感兴趣的。主要结果如下。首先,对于一般失真模型,对未压缩数据和模拟压缩数据训练的分类器的分类精度几乎相同。其次,不同压缩技术的分类结果存在一定差异。对于更复杂(现代)编码器产生的数据,可以观察到稍微更好的分类结果。对哈尔科夫和哈尔科夫地区两幅真实的三通道Sentinel-2图像进行了不同复杂度的实验。我们考虑了四种典型的类别。作为结论,可以说,要么必须修改一般的扭曲模型,要么应该对由相应压缩技术产生的数据进行分类器训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信