A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Ranking Aggregation

Stephen C. Loftus, Sydney Campbell
{"title":"A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Ranking Aggregation","authors":"Stephen C. Loftus, Sydney Campbell","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rankings—an ordering of items from best to worst—are a common way to summarize a group of items, often at an individual level. These ranks are ordinal data, and should not be acted on by standard mathematical operations such as averaging. Thus, combining these individual rankings to get a consensus can present a difficult challenge. In this paper we present a novel method of combining rankings via a Bayesian hierarchical model, using rankings and their corresponding ratings—an assessment of item quality—to create a data augmentation scheme similar to established literature. Simulations show that this method provides an accurate recovery of true rankings, particularly when the ranking system exhibits clustering within the structure. Additionally this method has the added benefit of being able to describe properties of the rankings, including how preferred one item is to another and the probability that an individual will rank one item higher than another.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rankings—an ordering of items from best to worst—are a common way to summarize a group of items, often at an individual level. These ranks are ordinal data, and should not be acted on by standard mathematical operations such as averaging. Thus, combining these individual rankings to get a consensus can present a difficult challenge. In this paper we present a novel method of combining rankings via a Bayesian hierarchical model, using rankings and their corresponding ratings—an assessment of item quality—to create a data augmentation scheme similar to established literature. Simulations show that this method provides an accurate recovery of true rankings, particularly when the ranking system exhibits clustering within the structure. Additionally this method has the added benefit of being able to describe properties of the rankings, including how preferred one item is to another and the probability that an individual will rank one item higher than another.
排序聚合的贝叶斯层次模型
排名——从最好到最差的项目排序——是总结一组项目的常用方法,通常是在个人层面上。这些排名是有序数据,不应该被标准的数学运算(如平均)所影响。因此,结合这些单独的排名来达成共识可能是一项艰巨的挑战。在本文中,我们提出了一种通过贝叶斯层次模型结合排名的新方法,使用排名及其相应的评级(项目质量的评估)来创建类似于已有文献的数据增强方案。仿真结果表明,该方法可以准确地恢复真实的排名,特别是当排名系统在结构中显示聚类时。此外,这种方法还有一个额外的好处,即能够描述排名的属性,包括一个项目比另一个项目更受欢迎的程度,以及个人将一个项目排名高于另一个项目的概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信