Independensi dan Urgensi Restrukturisasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Aspek Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Rico Yodi Tri Utama, R. Saraswati
{"title":"Independensi dan Urgensi Restrukturisasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Aspek Kekuasaan Kehakiman","authors":"Rico Yodi Tri Utama, R. Saraswati","doi":"10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i1.2740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Settlement of crimes by the criminal justice subsystem as a whole often does not run optimally. The position of the subsystems that are under the executive branch is sometimes used as a tool by the authorities to achieve their political goals regardless of the prevailing legal principles. This study aims to provide an overview of the position and function of criminal justice subsystems and focuses on finding the ideal system concept so that the implementation of an independent criminal justice system can be optimally realized by implementing a systems approach and restructuring the legal system. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach which is studied using a descriptive analysis. Based on the research results, the components of the criminal justice subsystem seem separate from one another, giving rise to sectoral egos and not yet showing the independence of each criminal justice subsystem. On that basis, to create an integrated, free and independent criminal justice system without any influence from power, it must provide a clear space for judicial independence (judicial power), thus placing the Supreme Court as the supervisor and controller of the entire criminal law enforcement process. The criminal justice subsystems must be under one door, not fragmented in other state institutions so that it is hoped that these subsystems can work optimally and be free from the influence of power.","PeriodicalId":395461,"journal":{"name":"Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i1.2740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Settlement of crimes by the criminal justice subsystem as a whole often does not run optimally. The position of the subsystems that are under the executive branch is sometimes used as a tool by the authorities to achieve their political goals regardless of the prevailing legal principles. This study aims to provide an overview of the position and function of criminal justice subsystems and focuses on finding the ideal system concept so that the implementation of an independent criminal justice system can be optimally realized by implementing a systems approach and restructuring the legal system. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach which is studied using a descriptive analysis. Based on the research results, the components of the criminal justice subsystem seem separate from one another, giving rise to sectoral egos and not yet showing the independence of each criminal justice subsystem. On that basis, to create an integrated, free and independent criminal justice system without any influence from power, it must provide a clear space for judicial independence (judicial power), thus placing the Supreme Court as the supervisor and controller of the entire criminal law enforcement process. The criminal justice subsystems must be under one door, not fragmented in other state institutions so that it is hoped that these subsystems can work optimally and be free from the influence of power.
基于司法权力的各个方面,印尼刑事司法制度的独立和紧急重组
刑事司法子系统对犯罪的解决作为一个整体往往运行不佳。在行政部门之下的子系统的地位有时被当局用作实现其政治目标的工具,而不顾现行的法律原则。本研究旨在概述刑事司法子系统的地位和功能,并着重于寻找理想的系统概念,以便通过实施系统方法和重构法律体系来最佳地实现刑事司法独立。本研究采用规范的法律研究方法,并采用描述性分析的法规方法进行研究。从研究结果来看,刑事司法子系统的组成部分似乎是相互分离的,产生了部门自我,尚未显示出每个刑事司法子系统的独立性。在此基础上,为了建立一个不受任何权力影响的完整、自由和独立的刑事司法系统,它必须为司法独立(司法权)提供明确的空间,从而使最高法院成为整个刑事执法过程的监督者和控制者。刑事司法子系统必须在一扇门之下,而不是分散在其他国家机构中,以便希望这些子系统能够最佳地工作,不受权力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信