“Gender Dysphoria”: Therapist Negotiations of Oppressive Practices

J. Ellis
{"title":"“Gender Dysphoria”: Therapist Negotiations of Oppressive Practices","authors":"J. Ellis","doi":"10.59158/001c.71238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has long been demonstrated that psychological and psychiatric fields pathologise and discipline certain bodies. However, few have explored practitioners’ resistance to, and critiques of, gender oppressive practices. Drawing from theoretical frameworks of transgender studies and queer theory, this paper reports on qualitative data gathered from semi-structured interviews with six therapists in Sydney, Australia. Case studies highlight the ruptures, dissonances, and possibilities of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) mental health care in practice. Thematic analysis of therapist case studies demonstrates how notions of “allyship” are inadequate in problematising power dynamics, binary gender, and cisgenderism, as therapists engaged in problematic discourses and practices in relation to their TGD clients. Exploring the limitations of traditional gatekeeping models, the paper situates counselling and psychotherapy practices within an Australian context as holding unique opportunities to engage in anti-oppressive practice with TGD clients. The research makes clear that active frameworks for challenging oppression in the lives of clients are essential to ethical, client-centred work.","PeriodicalId":394035,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59158/001c.71238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has long been demonstrated that psychological and psychiatric fields pathologise and discipline certain bodies. However, few have explored practitioners’ resistance to, and critiques of, gender oppressive practices. Drawing from theoretical frameworks of transgender studies and queer theory, this paper reports on qualitative data gathered from semi-structured interviews with six therapists in Sydney, Australia. Case studies highlight the ruptures, dissonances, and possibilities of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) mental health care in practice. Thematic analysis of therapist case studies demonstrates how notions of “allyship” are inadequate in problematising power dynamics, binary gender, and cisgenderism, as therapists engaged in problematic discourses and practices in relation to their TGD clients. Exploring the limitations of traditional gatekeeping models, the paper situates counselling and psychotherapy practices within an Australian context as holding unique opportunities to engage in anti-oppressive practice with TGD clients. The research makes clear that active frameworks for challenging oppression in the lives of clients are essential to ethical, client-centred work.
“性别焦虑”:压迫性行为的治疗师谈判
长期以来,心理学和精神病学领域对某些身体进行了病态化和纪律化。然而,很少有人探讨从业者对性别压迫做法的抵制和批评。从跨性别研究和酷儿理论的理论框架出发,本文报告了从澳大利亚悉尼六位治疗师的半结构化访谈中收集到的定性数据。案例研究强调了实践中跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)精神卫生保健的破裂、不和谐和可能性。治疗师案例研究的专题分析表明,当治疗师从事与TGD客户相关的有问题的话语和实践时,“盟友关系”的概念在解决权力动力学、二元性别和顺性别主义问题方面是不够的。探索传统守门人模式的局限性,本文将咨询和心理治疗实践置于澳大利亚的背景下,作为与TGD客户进行反压迫实践的独特机会。研究清楚地表明,在客户生活中挑战压迫的积极框架对于道德的、以客户为中心的工作至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信