{"title":"Artemis Controls (a)","authors":"Sherwood C. Frey","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2975127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Avion Chemicals has approached Artemis Controls regarding the purchase of an Artemis smart valve to manage the highly volatile phenol in its production process. Although an existing valve could be used, discussions lead to the possibility of designing a new and potentially much improved valve. Time, engineering, and software constraints make the valve-redesign project a risky endeavor. The tension between delivering the old valve and developing the new valve is centered on the marketing opportunity and financial risk. The A case decision can be structured with a basic decision diagram, but the analysis cannot be completed because likelihood statements are presented as “weasel words.” In addition to the alternatives presented in the case, students might propose several risk-reducing possibilities: delivering the standard valve if the new valve is only moderately successful, delivering the standard valve if the software development is extended, reframing the price structure for the resultant new valve, and proposing a contingent contract with the software developer.The A case is a modification of “Orion Controls (A)” (UVA-QA-0480). The probability statements of Orion have been replaced by the weasel words of Artemis. This modification allows the discussion to be less “numbers” oriented, more structural, and more strategic. \n \nExcerpt \n \nUVA-QA-0756 \n \nNov. 30, 2010 \n \nArtemis Controls (A) \n \nEven though the hiking trip to Shenandoah National Park was intended to be a restful interlude in his frenetic work pace, Nathan Armstrong, head of marketing at Artemis Controls (Artemis), found his mind wandering to his recent conversation with Andre Gide, executive vice president of Avion Chemicals (Avion). Contract discussions with Gide, who was responsible for worldwide corporate safety programs at Avion, had taken an interesting turn. Gide had initially contacted Artemis to place an order for 50 of Artemis's Model SV44A-10 smart-valve systems to manage the phenol flows at Avion's nine chemical plants worldwide. Their conversation, however, had led to the possibility that Artemis would develop an improved model for Avion at a substantially increased price. \n \nThe new system that Gide wanted would require an improvement in the flow-sensing-and-control part of the existing valve system to allow for real-time information processing and dynamic responses to changes in process states. In addition, the new system would require substantial improvement in valve capability to enable quick changes in valve-gate positions. Because of the dynamic nature of the real-time information flow, these improved valve systems would need to respond to instruction changes far more rapidly than the existing model could. \n \nThe Avion Contract \n \n. . .","PeriodicalId":121773,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Avion Chemicals has approached Artemis Controls regarding the purchase of an Artemis smart valve to manage the highly volatile phenol in its production process. Although an existing valve could be used, discussions lead to the possibility of designing a new and potentially much improved valve. Time, engineering, and software constraints make the valve-redesign project a risky endeavor. The tension between delivering the old valve and developing the new valve is centered on the marketing opportunity and financial risk. The A case decision can be structured with a basic decision diagram, but the analysis cannot be completed because likelihood statements are presented as “weasel words.” In addition to the alternatives presented in the case, students might propose several risk-reducing possibilities: delivering the standard valve if the new valve is only moderately successful, delivering the standard valve if the software development is extended, reframing the price structure for the resultant new valve, and proposing a contingent contract with the software developer.The A case is a modification of “Orion Controls (A)” (UVA-QA-0480). The probability statements of Orion have been replaced by the weasel words of Artemis. This modification allows the discussion to be less “numbers” oriented, more structural, and more strategic.
Excerpt
UVA-QA-0756
Nov. 30, 2010
Artemis Controls (A)
Even though the hiking trip to Shenandoah National Park was intended to be a restful interlude in his frenetic work pace, Nathan Armstrong, head of marketing at Artemis Controls (Artemis), found his mind wandering to his recent conversation with Andre Gide, executive vice president of Avion Chemicals (Avion). Contract discussions with Gide, who was responsible for worldwide corporate safety programs at Avion, had taken an interesting turn. Gide had initially contacted Artemis to place an order for 50 of Artemis's Model SV44A-10 smart-valve systems to manage the phenol flows at Avion's nine chemical plants worldwide. Their conversation, however, had led to the possibility that Artemis would develop an improved model for Avion at a substantially increased price.
The new system that Gide wanted would require an improvement in the flow-sensing-and-control part of the existing valve system to allow for real-time information processing and dynamic responses to changes in process states. In addition, the new system would require substantial improvement in valve capability to enable quick changes in valve-gate positions. Because of the dynamic nature of the real-time information flow, these improved valve systems would need to respond to instruction changes far more rapidly than the existing model could.
The Avion Contract
. . .
Avion Chemicals已与Artemis Controls接洽,购买Artemis智能阀门,以管理其生产过程中的高挥发性苯酚。虽然可以使用现有的阀门,但讨论导致了设计一种新的、可能大大改进的阀门的可能性。时间、工程和软件限制使阀门重新设计项目成为一项有风险的努力。交付旧阀门和开发新阀门之间的紧张关系集中在营销机会和财务风险上。A案例决策可以用一个基本的决策图来构建,但是无法完成分析,因为可能性陈述被表示为“模棱两可的词”。除了案例中提出的备选方案之外,学生们还可以提出几种降低风险的可能性:如果新阀门只是适度成功,则交付标准阀门;如果软件开发得到扩展,则交付标准阀门;重新制定新阀门的价格结构;提出与软件开发商签订临时合同。A型外壳是“猎户座控制(A)”(UVA-QA-0480)的修改版。俄里翁的概率陈述已经被阿尔忒弥斯的狡猾言辞所取代。这种修改使讨论不那么以“数字”为导向,而更具有结构性和战略性。阿尔忒弥斯控制公司(A)尽管去谢南多阿国家公园的徒步旅行是他疯狂工作节奏中的一个休息,但阿尔忒弥斯控制公司(Artemis)的市场营销主管内森·阿姆斯特朗发现他的注意力转移到了最近与艾维化学公司(Avion)执行副总裁安德烈·纪德的谈话上。与Gide的合同讨论发生了有趣的转折,Gide负责Avion的全球企业安全项目。Gide最初联系了Artemis,订购了50套Artemis的SV44A-10型智能阀门系统,用于管理Avion全球9家化工厂的苯酚流量。然而,他们的谈话导致阿尔忒弥斯可能会以大幅提高的价格为艾维恩开发一种改进的模型。Gide想要的新系统需要改进现有阀门系统的流量传感和控制部分,以允许实时信息处理和对过程状态变化的动态响应。此外,新系统还需要大幅度改进阀门性能,以实现阀门闸板位置的快速变化。由于实时信息流的动态性,这些改进的阀门系统需要比现有模型更快地响应指令变化。Avion合同…