Determination of an effective implementation of the differential evolution method to power shortage minimization

D. Iakubovskii, D. Krupenev, D. Boyarkin, N. Komendantova
{"title":"Determination of an effective implementation of the differential evolution method to power shortage minimization","authors":"D. Iakubovskii, D. Krupenev, D. Boyarkin, N. Komendantova","doi":"10.1109/ISSE51541.2021.9582487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constant development of electric power systems leads to their constant enlargement and complication; new ways of their control appear. In this regard, the existing models and software for adequacy assessment may work defective and ineffectively from the point of view of the adequacy of the obtained results, as well as the speed and accuracy of calculations. The key role in adequacy assessment of electric power systems (EPS) are played by optimization methods that allow to correctly determine the minimum of power shortage that occurs in various states of the EPS. A review of modern computational systems for adequacy assessment showed that the general concept of mathematical models is the same and can be described within the framework of the flow distribution problem. Despite this, each mathematical model is unique in its own way and requires an individual approach to its optimization. The purpose of this work is to analyze the efficiency of calculations in terms of accuracy and speed of various versions of the differential evolution (DE) method for the specified mathematical models within the framework of adequacy assessment of EPS. To achieve this goal, we solved several problems: two mathematical models were identified - a nonlinear model for minimizing the power shortage with the quadratic losses in flows and its modification with the controlled sections; differential evolution methods, including standard DE, composite DE, JDE, chaotic DE, adaptive DE; mutation strategies: DE/rand/1, DE/best/1, DE/rand/2, DE/best/2, DE/rand/3, DE/best/3, DE/current-to-rand/1, and DE/current-to-best/1. In this paper we tested the effectiveness of differential evolution methods, with different mutation strategies and different scales of EPSs. The experimental part was carried out using a software that was independent development by authors using C++. This complex includes the implementation of mathematical models and methods. The methods were tested on two systems with different numbers of adequacy zones, including those with three and seven adequacy zones. According to the research results, self-adaptive methods of DE are of the greatest interest for the further use and development of methods for this problem, due to automatic adjustment of the method parameters for each of the considered models and systems.","PeriodicalId":322521,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE51541.2021.9582487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Constant development of electric power systems leads to their constant enlargement and complication; new ways of their control appear. In this regard, the existing models and software for adequacy assessment may work defective and ineffectively from the point of view of the adequacy of the obtained results, as well as the speed and accuracy of calculations. The key role in adequacy assessment of electric power systems (EPS) are played by optimization methods that allow to correctly determine the minimum of power shortage that occurs in various states of the EPS. A review of modern computational systems for adequacy assessment showed that the general concept of mathematical models is the same and can be described within the framework of the flow distribution problem. Despite this, each mathematical model is unique in its own way and requires an individual approach to its optimization. The purpose of this work is to analyze the efficiency of calculations in terms of accuracy and speed of various versions of the differential evolution (DE) method for the specified mathematical models within the framework of adequacy assessment of EPS. To achieve this goal, we solved several problems: two mathematical models were identified - a nonlinear model for minimizing the power shortage with the quadratic losses in flows and its modification with the controlled sections; differential evolution methods, including standard DE, composite DE, JDE, chaotic DE, adaptive DE; mutation strategies: DE/rand/1, DE/best/1, DE/rand/2, DE/best/2, DE/rand/3, DE/best/3, DE/current-to-rand/1, and DE/current-to-best/1. In this paper we tested the effectiveness of differential evolution methods, with different mutation strategies and different scales of EPSs. The experimental part was carried out using a software that was independent development by authors using C++. This complex includes the implementation of mathematical models and methods. The methods were tested on two systems with different numbers of adequacy zones, including those with three and seven adequacy zones. According to the research results, self-adaptive methods of DE are of the greatest interest for the further use and development of methods for this problem, due to automatic adjustment of the method parameters for each of the considered models and systems.
确定了一种有效的差分进化方法来实现电力短缺最小化
电力系统的不断发展导致其不断扩大和复杂化;新的控制方式出现了。在这方面,从所获得的结果的充分性以及计算的速度和准确性来看,现有的充分性评估模型和软件可能存在缺陷和无效。在电力系统充分性评估中,优化方法起着关键作用,该方法能够正确确定电力系统各种状态下的最小缺电量。对现代充分性评估计算系统的回顾表明,数学模型的一般概念是相同的,并且可以在流量分配问题的框架内进行描述。尽管如此,每个数学模型都有其独特的方式,需要单独的方法来优化。本研究的目的是在EPS充分性评估的框架下,分析不同版本的差分进化(DE)方法在特定数学模型的计算精度和速度方面的效率。为了实现这一目标,我们解决了几个问题:确定了两个数学模型-一个非线性模型,用于最大限度地减少电力短缺与流动中的二次损失及其与受控路段的修正;差分进化方法,包括标准DE、复合DE、JDE、混沌DE、自适应DE;突变策略:DE/rand/1、DE/best/1、DE/rand/2、DE/best/2、DE/rand/3、DE/best/3、DE/current-to-rand/1和DE/current-to-best/1。在本文中,我们通过不同的突变策略和不同的eps规模来测试差异进化方法的有效性。实验部分采用作者独立开发的c++软件进行。这个综合体包括数学模型的实现和方法。这些方法在两个拥有不同数量充足区(包括3个和7个充足区)的系统上进行了测试。根据研究结果,DE的自适应方法对该问题的方法的进一步使用和发展最感兴趣,因为每个考虑的模型和系统的方法参数都会自动调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信