QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE

Оценка Качества, высшего образоваНия, Обзор Международного Опыта, Катерина Сергеевна Губа, K. Guba
{"title":"QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION: A REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE","authors":"Оценка Качества, высшего образоваНия, Обзор Международного Опыта, Катерина Сергеевна Губа, K. Guba","doi":"10.15826/UMPA.2019.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews international practice in managing and reforming national education quality assurance systems. Due to the influence of debates about instruments that have the potential to contribute to the development of quality education, many countries over the past decades have elaborated a system for assessing higher education quality. The review discusses both countries known for a long history of quality assurance (England or the United States) and cases that, under the influence of external pressures, developed a model of quality assessment from scratch. There are three significant trends in international experience. Firstly, countries either substantially reform the format of accreditation or abandon it entirely. There is a consensus among experts that the aim of the assessment system should be improving the quality of education. The accreditation is not suitable for it, since this format is generally related to satisfying the minimum standards. Secondly, more and more experts emphasize the advantages of quality audit, its format being related to assessing the university’s ability to autonomously maintain high standards of education quality. Third, the rejection of a unified assessment of universities is considered necessary, as it leads to a decrease in the diversity of the education system. A quality assurance system should take into account the specific features of the university, since the differentiated education system is more responsive to the demands of the labour market, the needs of students and society. The idea of creating uniform quality standards outside Russia and several countries of Eastern Europe not only lacks popularity, but is also criticized actively. All these trends allow us to conclude that the current Russian education quality assurance system does not meet international trends. In this regard, the experience of other countries in organizing the national system of education quality assessment is seen as particularly relevant to the context of Russian higher education.","PeriodicalId":310472,"journal":{"name":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/UMPA.2019.03.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The article reviews international practice in managing and reforming national education quality assurance systems. Due to the influence of debates about instruments that have the potential to contribute to the development of quality education, many countries over the past decades have elaborated a system for assessing higher education quality. The review discusses both countries known for a long history of quality assurance (England or the United States) and cases that, under the influence of external pressures, developed a model of quality assessment from scratch. There are three significant trends in international experience. Firstly, countries either substantially reform the format of accreditation or abandon it entirely. There is a consensus among experts that the aim of the assessment system should be improving the quality of education. The accreditation is not suitable for it, since this format is generally related to satisfying the minimum standards. Secondly, more and more experts emphasize the advantages of quality audit, its format being related to assessing the university’s ability to autonomously maintain high standards of education quality. Third, the rejection of a unified assessment of universities is considered necessary, as it leads to a decrease in the diversity of the education system. A quality assurance system should take into account the specific features of the university, since the differentiated education system is more responsive to the demands of the labour market, the needs of students and society. The idea of creating uniform quality standards outside Russia and several countries of Eastern Europe not only lacks popularity, but is also criticized actively. All these trends allow us to conclude that the current Russian education quality assurance system does not meet international trends. In this regard, the experience of other countries in organizing the national system of education quality assessment is seen as particularly relevant to the context of Russian higher education.
高等教育质量:国际实践回顾
本文回顾了管理和改革国家教育质量保证体系的国际实践。由于关于可能有助于发展优质教育的工具的辩论的影响,许多国家在过去几十年中已经制定了评估高等教育质量的系统。报告讨论了两个以质量保证历史悠久而闻名的国家(英国或美国),以及在外部压力的影响下从零开始发展质量评估模式的案例。国际经验有三个重要趋势。首先,各国要么对认证形式进行实质性改革,要么完全放弃。专家们一致认为,评估制度的目的应该是提高教育质量。认证不适合它,因为这种格式通常与满足最低标准有关。其次,越来越多的专家强调质量审计的优势,其形式关系到评估大学自主保持高水平教育质量的能力。第三,有人认为,拒绝大学统一评价会减少教育制度的多样性,这是必要的。质素保证制度应顾及大学的特色,因为差异化的教育制度更能回应劳工市场、学生和社会的需要。在俄罗斯和一些东欧国家之外建立统一质量标准的想法不仅缺乏知名度,而且受到了积极的批评。所有这些趋势使我们得出结论,目前俄罗斯的教育质量保证体系不符合国际趋势。在这方面,其他国家在组织国家教育质量评价制度方面的经验被认为特别适合俄罗斯高等教育的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信