Anti-Jewish Legislation in the Middle Ages

Birgit Wiedl
{"title":"Anti-Jewish Legislation in the Middle Ages","authors":"Birgit Wiedl","doi":"10.1515/9783110671995-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In contrast to today’s conception of a unified and uniting legal system, it was common for medieval societies to have several legal systems “at work” at the same time. Some of these legal authorities followed an hierarchical order, such as imperial/royal law that stood above the legislation enacted by territorial princes (at least in theory), who, as town lords, in return could change, overturn, or dictate municipal law. Parallel to these secular legal systems, church law was enforced by an equally graded system of hierarchies, while the vast field of customary laws is particularly difficult to grasp due to its vast diversity and mostly oral tradition. Inhabitants of medieval cities and rural communities were therefore subjected to several legal systems: the general law of the country (often a non-codified customary law), the municipal law of the respective city, several sets of ecclesiastical regulations, and depending on their profession, they could be subjected to regulations of a specific organisation (e.g., universities or craft guilds). This legal pluralism applied to Jews as well—they were granted their main legal standing from the respective ruler (see below); furthermore, they were permitted to enact their own halachic legislation within their communities. Their particular legal status, however, did not mean that Jews were exempt from other jurisdictional systems. They bought and sold their estates and properties according to the respective municipal and/or customary laws, paid and received dues and rents, and appeared as plaintiffs and defendants before all kinds of courts, showing them as more than passive recipients: they were active players who were not only aware of their legal circumstances but were also able to navigate within these frameworks.1 Anti-Jewish legislation is therefore only a part of medieval Jewry laws, and a part that existed parallel, and often in contrast to a neutral, or even positive legislation. It is also only a part of medieval anti-Jewish thought and agenda to which it contributed both ideas and measures to act upon. This essay cannot and does not claim to cover anti-Jewish legislation in medieval Europe exhaustively; in particular, the very diverse municipal and customary laws will be presented with a focus on the Ashkenazi regions of the Holy Roman Empire.","PeriodicalId":219982,"journal":{"name":"Confronting Antisemitism through the Ages: A Historical Perspective","volume":"351 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Confronting Antisemitism through the Ages: A Historical Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110671995-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In contrast to today’s conception of a unified and uniting legal system, it was common for medieval societies to have several legal systems “at work” at the same time. Some of these legal authorities followed an hierarchical order, such as imperial/royal law that stood above the legislation enacted by territorial princes (at least in theory), who, as town lords, in return could change, overturn, or dictate municipal law. Parallel to these secular legal systems, church law was enforced by an equally graded system of hierarchies, while the vast field of customary laws is particularly difficult to grasp due to its vast diversity and mostly oral tradition. Inhabitants of medieval cities and rural communities were therefore subjected to several legal systems: the general law of the country (often a non-codified customary law), the municipal law of the respective city, several sets of ecclesiastical regulations, and depending on their profession, they could be subjected to regulations of a specific organisation (e.g., universities or craft guilds). This legal pluralism applied to Jews as well—they were granted their main legal standing from the respective ruler (see below); furthermore, they were permitted to enact their own halachic legislation within their communities. Their particular legal status, however, did not mean that Jews were exempt from other jurisdictional systems. They bought and sold their estates and properties according to the respective municipal and/or customary laws, paid and received dues and rents, and appeared as plaintiffs and defendants before all kinds of courts, showing them as more than passive recipients: they were active players who were not only aware of their legal circumstances but were also able to navigate within these frameworks.1 Anti-Jewish legislation is therefore only a part of medieval Jewry laws, and a part that existed parallel, and often in contrast to a neutral, or even positive legislation. It is also only a part of medieval anti-Jewish thought and agenda to which it contributed both ideas and measures to act upon. This essay cannot and does not claim to cover anti-Jewish legislation in medieval Europe exhaustively; in particular, the very diverse municipal and customary laws will be presented with a focus on the Ashkenazi regions of the Holy Roman Empire.
中世纪的反犹立法
与今天的统一和统一的法律体系的概念相反,中世纪社会同时有几个法律体系“在工作”是很常见的。其中一些法律权威遵循等级秩序,例如帝国/皇家法律高于领土王子制定的立法(至少在理论上),作为城市领主,他们可以改变,推翻或支配城市法律。与这些世俗法律体系相平行的是,教会法是由一个同等等级的等级体系执行的,而广泛的习惯法领域由于其巨大的多样性和主要的口头传统而特别难以掌握。因此,中世纪城市和农村社区的居民受制于几种法律体系:国家的一般法律(通常是未编纂的习惯法),各自城市的市政法,几套教会法规,根据他们的职业,他们可能受制于特定组织的法规(例如,大学或工艺行会)。这种法律多元化也适用于犹太人——他们从各自的统治者那里获得了主要的法律地位(见下文);此外,他们被允许在自己的社区内颁布自己的halachic立法。然而,犹太人的特殊法律地位并不意味着他们可以不受其他司法制度的管辖。他们根据各自的市政和/或习惯法买卖自己的地产和财产,支付和收取会费和租金,并在各种法庭上作为原告和被告出现,表明他们不仅仅是被动的接受者:他们是积极的参与者,不仅了解他们的法律环境,而且能够在这些框架内导航因此,反犹立法只是中世纪犹太法律的一部分,而且是与中立甚至积极的立法平行存在的一部分。它也只是中世纪反犹太思想和议程的一部分,它为这些思想和行动提供了思想和措施。这篇文章不能也不会声称详尽地涵盖中世纪欧洲的反犹太人立法;特别是,将以神圣罗马帝国的德系犹太人地区为重点,介绍非常多样化的市政法和习惯法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信