Their Differences

{"title":"Their Differences","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199481217.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The three friends were completely united in their goals for India’s future. These were freedom, Hindu–Muslim unity, and the removal of untouchability. Occasionally Andrews, and even Tagore, pressed Gandhi about giving priority to the cause of abolishing untouchability. Tagore complained that social reform was taking a back seat to ‘khaddar’ and ‘economic recovery’. Andrews differed with Gandhi on the Khilafat question. All things considered, it was the purity of their friendship that kept all three of them ‘working’ continuously no matter what their differences were. Without that, how could Gandhi have written to Andrews: ‘I know what spiritual struggles mean for you.’","PeriodicalId":206255,"journal":{"name":"Friendships of 'Largeness and Freedom'","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Friendships of 'Largeness and Freedom'","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199481217.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The three friends were completely united in their goals for India’s future. These were freedom, Hindu–Muslim unity, and the removal of untouchability. Occasionally Andrews, and even Tagore, pressed Gandhi about giving priority to the cause of abolishing untouchability. Tagore complained that social reform was taking a back seat to ‘khaddar’ and ‘economic recovery’. Andrews differed with Gandhi on the Khilafat question. All things considered, it was the purity of their friendship that kept all three of them ‘working’ continuously no matter what their differences were. Without that, how could Gandhi have written to Andrews: ‘I know what spiritual struggles mean for you.’
他们之间的分歧
这三位朋友对印度未来的目标是完全一致的。这些是自由,印度教徒和穆斯林的团结,以及消除贱民制度。安德鲁斯,甚至泰戈尔,偶尔也会敦促甘地优先考虑废除贱民制度的事业。泰戈尔抱怨说,社会改革让位于“卡达尔”和“经济复苏”。安德鲁斯在希拉法特问题上与甘地意见不同。从各方面考虑,正是他们纯洁的友谊使他们三个人不管有什么分歧都能一直“工作”下去。如果没有这句话,甘地怎么会写信给安德鲁斯:“我知道精神上的挣扎对你意味着什么。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信