Notifying and Involving Users in Experimentation: Ethical Perceptions of Software Practitioners

S. Yaman, Fabian Fagerholm, Myriam Munezero, Hanna Mäenpää, T. Männistö
{"title":"Notifying and Involving Users in Experimentation: Ethical Perceptions of Software Practitioners","authors":"S. Yaman, Fabian Fagerholm, Myriam Munezero, Hanna Mäenpää, T. Männistö","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2017.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Experiment-driven development with the help of real usage data helps to build software products and services that are of high value to their users. As more software companies use experimentation in their development practises, ethical concerns are increasingly important. Objective: There is a need for understanding the ethical issues companies must take into account when practising experimentation as a development strategy. This paper examines how software development practitioners experience the need for notifying users when involving them in experimentation. Method: We conducted a survey within four software companies, inviting employees in different functional roles to indicate their attitudes and perceptions through a number of statements. Results: Employees working in different roles have different viewpoints on ethical issues. While managers are more conscious about company-customer relationships, UX designers appear more familiar with involving users. Developers think that details of experiments can be withheld from users if the results depend on it. Conclusion: Barriers to successfully conducting experiment-driven development are different for different roles. Clear and specific guidelines are needed for ethical aspects of experimentation.","PeriodicalId":213866,"journal":{"name":"2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2017.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Experiment-driven development with the help of real usage data helps to build software products and services that are of high value to their users. As more software companies use experimentation in their development practises, ethical concerns are increasingly important. Objective: There is a need for understanding the ethical issues companies must take into account when practising experimentation as a development strategy. This paper examines how software development practitioners experience the need for notifying users when involving them in experimentation. Method: We conducted a survey within four software companies, inviting employees in different functional roles to indicate their attitudes and perceptions through a number of statements. Results: Employees working in different roles have different viewpoints on ethical issues. While managers are more conscious about company-customer relationships, UX designers appear more familiar with involving users. Developers think that details of experiments can be withheld from users if the results depend on it. Conclusion: Barriers to successfully conducting experiment-driven development are different for different roles. Clear and specific guidelines are needed for ethical aspects of experimentation.
通知并让用户参与实验:软件从业者的道德观念
背景:在真实使用数据的帮助下,实验驱动的开发有助于构建对用户有高价值的软件产品和服务。随着越来越多的软件公司在他们的开发实践中使用实验,伦理问题变得越来越重要。目的:有必要了解公司在实践实验作为发展战略时必须考虑的道德问题。本文考察了软件开发从业者在参与实验时如何体验通知用户的需要。方法:我们在四家软件公司内部进行了一项调查,邀请不同职能角色的员工通过一些陈述来表明他们的态度和看法。结果:不同角色的员工对道德问题的看法不同。经理们更注重公司与客户的关系,而用户体验设计师似乎更熟悉用户的关系。开发人员认为,如果结果取决于实验细节,则可以向用户隐瞒实验细节。结论:不同角色成功开展实验驱动开发的障碍是不同的。实验的伦理方面需要明确和具体的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信