The Routledge Handbook of International Planning Education

K. Kunzmann
{"title":"The Routledge Handbook of International Planning Education","authors":"K. Kunzmann","doi":"10.1080/02513625.2021.1981021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leigh, N. G.; French, S. P.; Guhathakurta, S.; Stiftel, B. (eds.) (2020): The Routledge Handbook of International Planning Education. New York: Routledge, 370 pages, ISBN 9781138958777. of us, and our main task is to build different institutions” (p. 383). This is then the weakest point of the book. It provides a captivating and motivating long-term trajectory but renders the individual reality for practical and immediate impact weak. It could be that it is not about putting into practice or implementing, as many planners would call it. Perhaps, Bregman intends for humanity to uncover and show its best side – and allow radical change to happen together. “Humankind: A Hopeful History” shows an unexpected picture of our evolution: the survival of the friendliest and most cooperative human beings. Human history is filled with stories of friendship, mutual support, and compassion. The problem is not the lack thereof, but our distorted picture of human nature in society that is reenforced through institutions, education and even more unhelpful (social) media. As we are the only species that can blush and thereby make ourselves readable to others like open books (Bregman 2020: 71), it is the comparative advantage of humans to be social beings, having kindness and cooperation in their nature as homo cooperans (Moor 2013). Bregman uses a lively writing style to challenge the widespread assumption that humans are selfish, self-interested and, by nature, bad. His message is clear from the beginning, further supplemented during the book that is a good and captivating read also for non-academics. It takes the reader through personal contemplations and lively encounters to deliver or encourage our hopeful story. Though written without COVID-19 in mind or at the horizon of the pandemic, its content is even more important in 2021. As long-term consequences become clearer, can we, and should we rebuild with trust? At minimum, Bregman’s book should be read by planners and decision-makers to counterbalance our cynicism or choices to give up or believe that what is out there, is ‘ just the reality’. Maybe humanity is better than you think. If you are not sure, read Bregman and then it is worth discussing again.","PeriodicalId":379677,"journal":{"name":"disP - The Planning Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"disP - The Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2021.1981021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Leigh, N. G.; French, S. P.; Guhathakurta, S.; Stiftel, B. (eds.) (2020): The Routledge Handbook of International Planning Education. New York: Routledge, 370 pages, ISBN 9781138958777. of us, and our main task is to build different institutions” (p. 383). This is then the weakest point of the book. It provides a captivating and motivating long-term trajectory but renders the individual reality for practical and immediate impact weak. It could be that it is not about putting into practice or implementing, as many planners would call it. Perhaps, Bregman intends for humanity to uncover and show its best side – and allow radical change to happen together. “Humankind: A Hopeful History” shows an unexpected picture of our evolution: the survival of the friendliest and most cooperative human beings. Human history is filled with stories of friendship, mutual support, and compassion. The problem is not the lack thereof, but our distorted picture of human nature in society that is reenforced through institutions, education and even more unhelpful (social) media. As we are the only species that can blush and thereby make ourselves readable to others like open books (Bregman 2020: 71), it is the comparative advantage of humans to be social beings, having kindness and cooperation in their nature as homo cooperans (Moor 2013). Bregman uses a lively writing style to challenge the widespread assumption that humans are selfish, self-interested and, by nature, bad. His message is clear from the beginning, further supplemented during the book that is a good and captivating read also for non-academics. It takes the reader through personal contemplations and lively encounters to deliver or encourage our hopeful story. Though written without COVID-19 in mind or at the horizon of the pandemic, its content is even more important in 2021. As long-term consequences become clearer, can we, and should we rebuild with trust? At minimum, Bregman’s book should be read by planners and decision-makers to counterbalance our cynicism or choices to give up or believe that what is out there, is ‘ just the reality’. Maybe humanity is better than you think. If you are not sure, read Bregman and then it is worth discussing again.
劳特利奇国际规划教育手册
利,n.g.;法语,s.p.;Guhathakurta,美国;(编)(2020):国际规划教育的劳特利奇手册。纽约:Routledge出版社,370页,ISBN 9781138958777。我们的主要任务是建立不同的制度”(第383页)。这是本书最薄弱的地方。它提供了一个迷人和激励的长期轨迹,但却使个人现实的实际和直接影响变得脆弱。它可能不是付诸实践或执行,就像许多规划者所说的那样。也许,布雷格曼打算让人类发现并展示其最好的一面,并允许彻底的改变一起发生。《人类:充满希望的历史》展示了人类进化的一幅意想不到的画面:最友好、最合作的人类得以生存。人类历史上充满了友谊、相互支持和同情的故事。问题不在于缺乏人性,而在于我们在社会中扭曲的人性图景,这种图景通过制度、教育,甚至更无益的(社交)媒体得到强化。由于我们是唯一会脸红的物种,因此我们可以像打开的书一样让别人读懂我们自己(Bregman 2020: 71),人类作为社会生物的比较优势是,作为合作人,我们的本性中有善良和合作(Moor 2013)。布雷格曼用一种生动活泼的写作风格挑战了人们普遍认为的人类是自私的、自私自利的、本性恶劣的假设。他的信息从一开始就很清楚,在书中进一步补充,这是一个很好的和迷人的阅读,也为非学者。它带领读者通过个人的沉思和生动的相遇来传递或鼓励我们充满希望的故事。虽然在写作时没有考虑到COVID-19,也没有考虑到大流行的到来,但在2021年,其内容更加重要。随着长期后果变得更加清晰,我们能否、是否应该重建信任?至少,规划者和决策者应该读一读布雷格曼的书,以平衡我们的玩世不恭、放弃或相信外面的东西“就是现实”的选择。也许人性比你想的要好。如果你不确定,可以读一读布雷格曼的作品,然后再讨论一下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信