Single-session prophylactic pan-retinal photocoagulation in moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy in low-resource settings

Ahmed Fathalla, Khaled Abdelazeem, S. Kedwany, T. Mohamed, Mahmoud Abdel-Radi, M. Mostafa, E. Wasfi, D. El-Sebaity
{"title":"Single-session prophylactic pan-retinal photocoagulation in moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy in low-resource settings","authors":"Ahmed Fathalla, Khaled Abdelazeem, S. Kedwany, T. Mohamed, Mahmoud Abdel-Radi, M. Mostafa, E. Wasfi, D. El-Sebaity","doi":"10.4103/erj.erj_1_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To study patient's acceptability and safety of offering a prophylactic early single session of pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) for moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in selected patients. Settings and Design: Mixed observational and interventional study. Patients and Methods: The observational study included 82 eyes of 68 patients presenting with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or its complications and the interventional study included 48 eyes of 48 patients with moderate NPDR who were offered a single session PRP because they were unlikely to comply with the follow-up protocol and were at higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression. Results: The observational study showed that nearly 51% of patients had no idea about the DR screening protocols, 47.5% of included eyes presented with vitreous hemorrhage, 30.5% with tractional retinal detachment, and 22% with retinal neovascularization. The interventional study showed that minor patients' complaints were reported such as night vision problems, flashes, and peripheral field defects. There was no significant change in the mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) over time throughout the study (P = 0.951). At the end of follow-up, 89.5% of included eyes showed no loss of any lines of their preoperative logMAR CDVA and 10.5% lost only one line. All eyes remained in the same stage of moderate NPDR with no signs of progression to severe or very severe NPDR or proliferative DR. Conclusion: Prophylactic early PRP is an acceptable, safe, and satisfactory procedure for patients with moderate NPDR in low-resource settings.","PeriodicalId":201997,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Retina Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Retina Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/erj.erj_1_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To study patient's acceptability and safety of offering a prophylactic early single session of pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) for moderate nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) in selected patients. Settings and Design: Mixed observational and interventional study. Patients and Methods: The observational study included 82 eyes of 68 patients presenting with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) or its complications and the interventional study included 48 eyes of 48 patients with moderate NPDR who were offered a single session PRP because they were unlikely to comply with the follow-up protocol and were at higher risk of diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression. Results: The observational study showed that nearly 51% of patients had no idea about the DR screening protocols, 47.5% of included eyes presented with vitreous hemorrhage, 30.5% with tractional retinal detachment, and 22% with retinal neovascularization. The interventional study showed that minor patients' complaints were reported such as night vision problems, flashes, and peripheral field defects. There was no significant change in the mean preoperative logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) over time throughout the study (P = 0.951). At the end of follow-up, 89.5% of included eyes showed no loss of any lines of their preoperative logMAR CDVA and 10.5% lost only one line. All eyes remained in the same stage of moderate NPDR with no signs of progression to severe or very severe NPDR or proliferative DR. Conclusion: Prophylactic early PRP is an acceptable, safe, and satisfactory procedure for patients with moderate NPDR in low-resource settings.
低资源环境下中度非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变单期预防性全视网膜光凝治疗
目的:探讨选择性患者对中度非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)早期预防性单次泛视网膜光凝治疗(PRP)的可接受性和安全性。背景和设计:观察性和干预性混合研究。患者和方法:观察性研究包括68例增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)或其并发症患者的82只眼,介入性研究包括48例中度糖尿病视网膜病变患者的48只眼,因为他们不太可能遵守随访方案,并且糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)进展的风险较高,因此给予单次PRP。结果:观察性研究显示,近51%的患者不知道DR筛查方案,47.5%的纳入眼出现玻璃体出血,30.5%出现牵拉性视网膜脱离,22%出现视网膜新生血管。介入研究显示,轻微的患者主诉如夜视问题、闪光和周围视野缺损被报道。在整个研究过程中,最小分辨角(logMAR)矫正距离视力(CDVA)的术前平均对数随时间无显著变化(P = 0.951)。随访结束时,89.5%的纳入眼未出现术前logMAR CDVA的任何线丢失,10.5%仅丢失一条线。所有的眼睛都处于中度NPDR的同一阶段,没有进展到严重或极严重NPDR或增殖性dr的迹象。结论:对于资源匮乏的中度NPDR患者,预防性早期PRP是一种可接受、安全且令人满意的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信