Clinical and microbiological efficacy of hyaluronic acid gel compared to chlorhexidine in the treatment of gingivitis

Ismael Ibrahim Mohammed, Ziwar Ahmad Saleh, Vian Muhammed Hussein
{"title":"Clinical and microbiological efficacy of hyaluronic acid gel compared to chlorhexidine in the treatment of gingivitis","authors":"Ismael Ibrahim Mohammed, Ziwar Ahmad Saleh, Vian Muhammed Hussein","doi":"10.56056/amj.2022.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Chemotherapeutic agents have the potential to inhibit plaque growth, reduce gingivitis and improve oral health beyond tooth brushing alone. The aim of this study is to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of 0.2% hyaluronic acid-containing gel (Gengigel) with a 0.2% chlorhexidine containing gel effect, in the treatment of plaque induced gingivitis. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical case control study involved 150 generally healthy patients, age ranging 20-40 years, with gingivitis. The patients were divided in two groups, after scaling and polishing, 75 patients in each. The first group was given 0.2% hyaluronic acid containing gel and the second group was given 0.2 % chlorhexidine containing gel. Clinical examination, which included bleeding on probing, plaque index at the baseline, after 7 days and after 21 days were calculated. Antimicrobial properties of both gels in the saliva were measured by agar diffusion method. Results: No significant difference was detected between the two groups regarding the mean ranks of the Plaque index difference after a week (chlorhexidine group = 0.81, hyaluronic acid group = 0.89) and after three weeks (0.58, 0.54 respectively). The mean of the difference in Bleeding index after one week in the chlorhexidine group (39.44) were significantly higher than those (32.87) of the group of hyaluronic acid, But the difference was not significant after three weeks (37.40 and 37.27 respectively). The chlorhexidine group inhibition zone (19.2) was significantly higher than the hyaluronic acid group (10.6) Conclusions: in this study, the adjunctive use of 0.2 percent hyaluronic acid gel is comparable to 0.2 percent chlorhexidine gel for gingivitis treatment.","PeriodicalId":314832,"journal":{"name":"Advanced medical journal","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56056/amj.2022.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Chemotherapeutic agents have the potential to inhibit plaque growth, reduce gingivitis and improve oral health beyond tooth brushing alone. The aim of this study is to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of 0.2% hyaluronic acid-containing gel (Gengigel) with a 0.2% chlorhexidine containing gel effect, in the treatment of plaque induced gingivitis. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical case control study involved 150 generally healthy patients, age ranging 20-40 years, with gingivitis. The patients were divided in two groups, after scaling and polishing, 75 patients in each. The first group was given 0.2% hyaluronic acid containing gel and the second group was given 0.2 % chlorhexidine containing gel. Clinical examination, which included bleeding on probing, plaque index at the baseline, after 7 days and after 21 days were calculated. Antimicrobial properties of both gels in the saliva were measured by agar diffusion method. Results: No significant difference was detected between the two groups regarding the mean ranks of the Plaque index difference after a week (chlorhexidine group = 0.81, hyaluronic acid group = 0.89) and after three weeks (0.58, 0.54 respectively). The mean of the difference in Bleeding index after one week in the chlorhexidine group (39.44) were significantly higher than those (32.87) of the group of hyaluronic acid, But the difference was not significant after three weeks (37.40 and 37.27 respectively). The chlorhexidine group inhibition zone (19.2) was significantly higher than the hyaluronic acid group (10.6) Conclusions: in this study, the adjunctive use of 0.2 percent hyaluronic acid gel is comparable to 0.2 percent chlorhexidine gel for gingivitis treatment.
透明质酸凝胶与氯己定治疗牙龈炎的临床及微生物学疗效比较
背景和目的:化疗药物具有抑制菌斑生长、减少牙龈炎和改善口腔健康的潜力,而不仅仅是刷牙。本研究的目的是比较0.2%含透明质酸凝胶(Gengigel)和0.2%含氯己定凝胶治疗菌斑性牙龈炎的疗效。方法:本横断面分析病例对照研究纳入150例一般健康的牙龈炎患者,年龄在20-40岁之间。患者分为两组,分别进行洗牙和抛光,每组75例。第一组给予0.2%透明质酸凝胶,第二组给予0.2%氯己定凝胶。计算临床检查,包括探查出血、基线、7天、21天斑块指数。用琼脂扩散法测定两种凝胶在唾液中的抗菌性能。结果:两组治疗1周后(氯己定组= 0.81,透明质酸组= 0.89)和治疗3周后(分别为0.58、0.54)斑块指数的平均等级差异无显著性差异。氯己定组1周后出血指数的平均值(39.44)显著高于透明质酸组(32.87),但3周后差异无统计学意义(分别为37.40和37.27)。氯己定组的抑制带(19.2)明显高于透明质酸组(10.6)。结论:本研究中,辅助使用0.2%透明质酸凝胶与0.2%氯己定凝胶治疗牙龈炎效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信